Wittgenstein’s Philosophy and Austrian Economics
Abstract
The paper, following a suggestion by Kripke, argues that there is an illuminating analogy between Wittgenstein’s philosophy and Austrian economics (particularly that of Mises and Hayek). Most scholars interpret paragraph 608 of Wittgenstein’s Zettel (hereafter Z608) to suggest that language might arise out of physical chaos at the neural centre. Since, however, Wittgenstein holds that the philosopher must not advance theories, he cannot consistently be advancing such theories in Z608. Rather, all the key concepts in Z608 must be cashed in terms of Wittgenstein’s “forms of life”. Thus, Z608, read carefully, suggests that language “arises”, not out of chaos in the brain, but out of the chaotic activities in human forms of life. The paper shows that an analogous picture occurs in the early Austrian economists (such as Hayek, who is Wittgenstein’s cousin, and Mises). Z608 is part of a still unappreciated Austrian movement that emphasizes the creative chaos in human life. In this connection the paper explains how Z608 is an application of Wittgenstein’s “private language argument” against a neural theory of a private language. Finally, the paper shows that the real argument in Z608 traces to early Austrian phenomenology—shedding light both on Wittgenstein’s philosophy and on Austrian economics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ayer, A. J. (1966). Can there be private-language? In G. Pitcher (Ed.), Wittgenstein: The philosophical investigations (pp.251-266). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Beaudreau, B. C. (2011). On the emergence and evolution of economic complexity. Modern Economy, 2, 266-278.
Birner, J., & Zijp, R. (1994). Hayek, co-ordination and evolution: His legacy in philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. London/New York: Routledge.
Callahan, G. (2004). Economics for real people. Seattle: CreateSpace.
Davies, M. (1991). Concepts, connectionism, and the language of thought. In R. S. Rummelhart (Ed.), Philosophy and connectionist theory (pp.229-257). Hillsdale: Lawrence_Erlbaum.
Dennett, D. (1996). The intentional stance. Cambridge: MIT.
Faggini, M., & Parziale, A. (2012). The failure of economic theory: Lessons from chaos theory. Modern Economy, 3, 1-10.
Friedman, M. (1990). Free to choose. Boston: Mariner.
Friedman, M. (1993). The “plucking model” of business fluctuations revisited. Economic Inquiry, 31(2), 171-177.
Friedman, M. (1994). Discussion of Hayek’s road to serfdom: URL: http://thedailyhatch.org/2012/07/31/milton-and-rose-friedman-two-lucky-people/
Garrison, R. (1996). Friedman’s plucking model. Economic Inquiry, 34(4), 799-802. URL: http://www.auburn.edu/~garriro/fm1pluck.htm
Gleick, J. (1998). Chaos: The amazing science of the unpredictable. New York, NY: Vintage.
Gordon, D. (2000). An introduction to economic reasoning. Atlanta: Mises Institute.
Haller, R. (1988). Questions on Wittgenstein. New York: Routledge.
Hark, T. (1995). Electric brainfields and memory traces: Wittgenstein and gestalt psychology. Philosophical Investigations, 18(2), 113-138.
Harris, H. (2002). Things come to life: Spontaneous generation revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4), 519-530.
Hayek, F. A. (1955). The counter-revolution of science: Studies on the abuse of reason. New York: Free Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty: The mirage of social justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1991). The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1996). Individualism and the economic order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (2011a). Lecture on evolution & spontaneous order in 1983 (33rd Meeting Nobel Laureates at Lindau). URL: http://studiesinemergentorder.org/2011/05/14/hayek-on-spontaneous-order-and-evolution/
Hayek, F. A. (2011b). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heaton, J. (2000). Wittgenstein and psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Totem.
Hesiod. (2009). Theogony and works and days. In West (Trans.). Oxford: Oxford World Classics.
Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein on rules and private language. Cambridge: Harvard.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kurrild-Klitgaard, P. (2003). The viennese connection: Alfred Schutz and the Austrian school. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 6 (2): 35-67. URL: http://mises.org/document/1258/The-Viennese-Connection-Alfred-Schutz-and-the-Austrian-School
Litschka, M., & Grechenig, K. ( 2010). Law by human intent or evolution? Some remarks on the Austrian school of economics’ role in the development of law and economics. European Journal of Law and Economics, 29(10), 57-79.
Malcolm, N. (1997). Wittgenstein: From a religious point of view? New York, NY: Routledge.
Malcolm, N. (1986). Nothing is hidden. Oxford: Blackwell.
McDonough, R. (2004). Wittgenstein, German organicism, chaos and the centre of life. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 42(3), 297–326.
McDonough, R. (1989). Towards a non-mechanistic theory of meaning. Mind, 98(389), 1-21.
McDonough, R. (2013). The religious-cosmological reading of Zettel 608. Sophia Springer, 52(2), 259-279.
McDonough, R. (2014a). Wittgenstein’s Zettel 608 from a religious point of view: An analogy with martin buber. Iyyun, 63, 259-288.
McDonough, R. (2014b). Heidegger’s Ereignis and Wittgenstein on the genesis of language. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4(3), 416-431.
McGinn, C. (1984). Wittgenstein on meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.
Menger, K. (1928). Dimensionstheorie. Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.
Miller, H. L. Jr. (1962). On the “Chicago school of economics”. The Journal of Political Economy, 70(1), 64-69.
Mises, L. (2003). Epistemological problems of economics. In Resiman (Trans.). New York, NY: NYU Press. URL: http://mises.org/books/epistemological.pdf
Mises, L. (1996). Human action. Irvington: Foundation for Economic Education. URL: http://www.mises.org/page/1470/Human_Action
Monk, R. (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The duty of genius. New York, NY: Penguin.
Nove, A. (1992). The economics of feasible socialism revisited. London: Routledge.
Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge: MIT.
Rockwell, L. (2014). Against the state: An anarcho-capitalist manifesto. Auburn: Rockwell Communication.
Sellars, W. (1991). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Science, perception and reality (pp.127-196). Atascadero: Ridgeview.
Skarbek, D. (2009). F. A. Hayek’s influence on Nobel Prize winners. Review of Austrian Economics, 22(10), 109.
Smith, A. ( 2013). The wealth of nations. Project Gutenberg. URL: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3300/3300-h/3300-h.htm
Smith, B. (1996). Austrian philosophy: The legacy of franz brentano. Chicago/LaSalle: Open Court.
Toulmin, S., & Janik, A. (1972). Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Traupman, J. (1991). German & English dictionary. New York/London: Bantam.
Wagner, R. E. (2010). Mind, society and action. New York/London: Routledge.
Waismann, F. (2012). Introduction to mathematical thinking. New York, NY: Dover.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). In Anscombe (Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1970). Zettel. In Anscombe (Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1972b). On certainty. In Paul & Anscombe (Trans.). New York, NY: Harper.
Wittgenstein, L. (1961). Tractatus-logico-philosophicus. In Pears & McGuiness (Trans.). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Notebooks, 191416. In Anscombe (Trans.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Wittgenstein, L. (1972a). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. In Anscombe (Trans.). Cambridge: MIT
Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Culture and value. In Winch (Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wozinski, J. (2010, October). Hayek and the departure from praexology. Journal of Libertarian Scholarship. URL: http://libertarianpapers.org/article/24-wozinski-hayek-and-departure-from-praxeology/
Yami, H. (2005). Behaviourism and psychologism: Why block’s argument against behaviorism is unsound. Philosophical Psychology, 18(2), 179-286.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/5884
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Share us to: 
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; sss@cscanada.net; sss@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Sociology of Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures 
