MIND-AS-BODY Metaphor in Igbo
Abstract
Polysemy and metaphor have been discussed by many linguists. It is generally agreed that polysemy arises from a general cognitive ability humans possess. Metaphor is seen as general and basic to humans in both thought and language. Uwalaka (1988) mentions the verbs of perception in Igbo with a focus on the argument structure and semantic roles associated with this class of verbs. However, no mention is made about the polysemous nature of this special class of verbs, as well as the cognitive basis for this phenomenon. Following the ways of semantic extension in English perception verbs in Sweetser (1990) and Ibarretxe-Antuñano (1999, 2002, 2008), this paper treats perception verbs in Igbo with a focus on two things. First, to find out the range of metaphorical extensions associated with these verbs in Igbo, and to establish the extent to which the language data supports the claim that these metaphorical mappings are cross-linguistic. Finally, it is observed that the MIND-AS-BODY metaphor is not only productive in Igbo, it also follows the pattern attested in the literature.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allerton, D. J. (1979). Essentials of Grammatical Theory: A Consensus View of Syntax and Morphology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Barcelona, A. (1997). ‘Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and Metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics’. Atlantis XIX.1: 21-48.
Bartsch, R. (2002). Generating polysemy: metaphor and metonymy. In R. Dirven and R. Porings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp.49-74). Berlin, New York: Mouton der Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
Echeruo. M. J. C. (1998). Igbo-English dictionary: A comprehensive dictionary of igbo language with an English-igbo index. Nigeria: Longman
Emenanjọ, N. E. (2015). A grammar of contemporary Igbo: Constituents, features and processes. Port Harcourt, Nigeria: M & J Grand Orbit Communications Ltd.
Evans, V. (2019). Cognitive linguistics: A complete guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
George, L., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (1999). Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross–linguistic study. (PhDdiss., University of Edinburgh)
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2002). Mind-as-body as a cross-linguistic conceptual metaphor. Miscelánea. A Journal of English and American Studies, 25, 93-119
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2008). Vision metaphors for the intellect: Are they really cross-linguistic?. Atlantis, 30(1), 15-33.
Igwe, E. G. (1999). Igbo-English dictionary. Ibadan: University Press Plc.
Johnson, M. (1992). Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics. Cognitive Linguistics, 3(4), 345-366.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind (pp.31-50). (Chicago and London: Chicago University Press,).
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. (2 Vols.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manasia, M. G. (2016). Polysemy and metaphor in the verbs of perception. SSRN Electronic Journal
Ou, Q. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18-28. Available from http://www.cscanada.net/index.php/sll/article/view/10055 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10055
Radden, G., & Dirven, R. (2007). Cognitive English grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub.
Radden, G., & Kovecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-W. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.17-59). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rojo, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2004-2005). Verbs of sensory perception: An English-Spanish comparison. Languages in Contrast, 5(2), 219-43.
Sekuler, R., & Blake, R. (1994). Perception. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sweetser, E. (1986). Polysemy vs. abstraction: Mutually exclusive or complementary. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp.528-538). Berkeley, Ca.: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, J. R. (1989). Linguistic categorization. Prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford Clarendon Press.
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Putten, S. (2020). Perception verbs and the conceptualization of the senses: The case of Avatime”. Linguistics, 58(2), 425-462
Viberg, Ä. (1984). The verbs of perception: a typological study. In B. Comrie and O. Dahl (Eds.), Explanations for Language Universals (pp.123-162). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Williamson, K. (2013). Dictionary of Ònìchà Igbo (2nd ed.) (R. Blench, Ed.). Benin City: Ethiope Pub. Corp.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12635
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard
Please send your manuscripts to sll@cscanada.net,or sll@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org
Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture