Alternative Assessment in the Moroccan EFL Classrooms Teachers’ Conceptions and Practices
Abstract
This study aimed at examining the status of various alternative assessment techniques within the Moroccan EFL public high school classrooms. It is governed by three main objectives: eliciting the Moroccan EFL teachers’ conceptions and practices of alternative assessment, identifying the major problems that inhibit the implementation of alternative assessment and, accordingly, suggesting some possible solutions. Additionally, issues related to training, assessment guidelines, as well as the curriculum were all touched upon. Data were collected from 73 EFL public high school teachers from Inzegane-AitMelloul and Agadir-Ida-outanane delegations using a questionnaire and focus group interviews. The results revealed that the practice of alternative assessment is slowly evolving within the Moroccan EFL context in spite of the very positive attitudes expressed towards it. The practice of traditional assessment, on the other hand, seems to be taking the lead in the teachers’ practices up to date. The results also indicate that teachers face different sorts of challenges including mainly time constraints, class size, and lack of training. Accordingly, it is recommended that policy makers should address these problems through providing the necessary facilities and the required training on how to cope with them more successfully for a better implementation of the assessment changes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ak, E., & Guvendi, M. (2010). Assessment of the degree to which primary school teachers use alternative assessment and evaluation methods. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5599-5604.
Akbulut, E. O., & Akbulut, K. (2011). Science and technology teacher candidates’ opinions regarding alternative assessment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3531-3535.
Anderson, R. S. (1998). Why Talk about different ways to grade? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 5-16. Retrieved on 10th January 2014 from http://www.jcu.edu/academic/planassess/pdf/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.7401
Atta-Alla, M. (2012). Investigating alternative assessment practices in pre-service English teacher education programs. International Journal of English Language Education, 1, 1.
Arter, J. (2003). Assessment for learning: classroom assessment to improve student achievement and well-being. Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480068.pdf
Banda, W. J. S. (2005). Classroom assessment in Malawi: Teachers’ perceptions and practices in mathematics (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02212005-131851/unrestricted/wjsb_dissertation_JAN2005.pdf
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education. Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Longman.
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653-675.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Merrill.
Dawson, C. (2007). A Practical guide to research methods: A user-friendly manual for mastering research techniques and projects (3rd ed.). British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Genesee, F., & Hamayan, E. (1994). Classroom-based assessment. In F. Genesee (Ed.), Educating second language children. The whole child, The whole curriculum, the whole community (pp.212-239.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huerta-Macias, A. (1995). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. In J. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology in language teaching. An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Majid, A. F. (2011). School-based assessment in Malaysian schools: The concerns of the English teachers. Journal of US-China Education, 8 (5), 1-15.
McKay, P. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ministry of National Education. (2007). Ministerial circular N° 142-07. English Language Guidelines for the Assessment of Foreign Languages in High Schools.
Ministry of National Education. (2007). English language guidelines for secondary schools: Common core, first year, and second year baccalaureate. Rabat, Morocco.
Nasri, N., Roslan, S. N., Iskandar Sekuan, M., Abu Bakar, K., & Nor Puteh, S. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions on alternative assessment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 37-42.
Omalley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language: Practical approaches for teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Oren, S. F., Ormanci, U., & Evrekl, E. (2011). The science and technology pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy levels and opinions about alternative assessment and evaluation Approaches. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1690-1698.
Pfannkuch, M. (2001). Assessment of school mathematics: teachers’ perceptions and practices. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(3), 185-203.
Serkan, B., & Nilgum, T. (2011). Development of self-efficacy towards using alternative assessment scale. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev, 2, 85-495. doi: 10.1007/s12564-010-9140-y
Tsagari, D. (2004). Is there Life beyond language testing? An introduction to alternative language assessment. Center for Research in Language Education, CRILE Working Papers, No.58.
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. McGraw-Hill Education, Open University Press.
Wall, D. (2000). The impact of high-stakes testing on teaching and learning: Can this be predicted or controlled? System, 28, 499-509.
WATT, H. M. G. (2005). Attitudes to the use of alternative assessment methods in mathematics: A study with secondary mathematics teachers in sydney, Australia. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 21-44.
Yang, T. Y. (2008). Factors affecting EFL teachers’ use of multiple classroom assessment practices with young language learners. English Teaching & Learning, 32(4), 85-123.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10161
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Abdallah GHAICHA, Elmostafa OMARKALY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures 
