Legal Regulation on the Evaluation of Teachers’ Professional Titles in Public Universities

Xueqing RUI

Abstract


With the frequent disputes over the evaluation of teachers’ professional title in public universities,the standardized operation of the teachers’ professional title evaluation in public universities has become a new problem faced by public universities and the government.Public universities should focus on improving the self-regulation mechanism for the teachers’ professional title evaluation.The government should take guidance and cooperation as the principles and replace the traditional approval model with flexible supervision.Judicial review should intervene in the teachers’ professional title evaluation in public universities to protect the rights and interests of teachers, but the academic autonomy of universities should be respected.

Keywords


Professional title evaluation; Self-regulation; Government regulation; Judicial review

Full Text:

PDF

References


Charles, H. H. (2007). The Rise of the University (pp.3-7) (Y. Z. Mei, Trans.) Shanghai: Sanlian Bookstore.

Huang, S. P. (2013). Academic freedom, university autonomy and state supervision: Review the norms and supervision mechanisms of disputes over plagiarism of doctoral and master’s thesis from the meaning and boundaries of university autonomy. The Taiwan Law Review, (7), 5-27.

Jiang, M. A. (2015).Administrative law and administrative procedure law (p.3). Beijing: Peking University Press, Higher Education Press.

Li, R. R. (2007). On the nature of the power game between central and local higher education in my country’s transitional period. Tsinghua University Education Research, (1), 18-24.

Liu, J. S. (2017). The logic, reform and bottleneck of decentralization of the evaluation of professional titles of college teachers. China Higher Education Research, (7), 81-86.

Mo, Y. C. (2013). Administrative democratization and the development of administrative guidance system (Part 1)——Taking the practice of administrative guidance in the context of building a service-oriented government as a story clue. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, (3), 1-25.

Qu, Z. H. (2019). An analysis of the evaluation reform of teachers’ professional titles in my country’s colleges and universities. University Education Science, (1), 51.

Shen, K. (2000). System changes and Judges’ Choice of rules:A preliminary exploration based on Liu Yan’s copywriting. Peking University Law Review, (2), 159-203.

Tsutomu, M., Yoshikazu, S., Kiyoshi, H. (2014). Annotation to the Japanese administrative procedure law (pp.217-223) (M. Zhu, Trans.). Shanghai: Sanlian Bookstore.

Wei, H. M., & Wang, X. (2018). On the Decentralization and Regulation of the Evaluation Power of University Teachers’ Professional Titles. Jiangsu Higher Education, (9), 38.

William, W. (1997). Administrative law (p.95) (B. Xu, Trans.). Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.

Wu, N. W., & Liu, Z. Z. (2017). The rule of law in education: Idea, practice and carrier: summary of the 2016 “China Education Rule of Law and Education Development Summit Forum”. Fudan Education Forum, (1), 25-30.

Xu, J. (2014). On the connotation, formation and value of social public power from the perspective of law. China Legal Science, (1), 79-101.

Yao, R. (2017). On the public laws and regulations of the evaluation power of teachers’ professional titles in public universities. Journal of Higher Education Management, (4), 47-57.

Ye, B. F., & Zhou, Y. Y. (1998). On the legal nature of the assignment of teachers’ professional titles. Jiangxi Social Sciences, (12),114-115.

Yuan, M. S. (2006). Interpretation of the “Organizational Qualification Authorized by Laws and Regulations” of colleges and universities. Administrative Law Review, (2), 1-6.

Zhan, Z. L. (2008). On the improvement of teachers’ appeal system in Chinese higher education. Chinese Educational Law Review, (7), 105-134.

Zhang, H. F. (2018). Research on the game mechanism of university co-governance. University Education Science, (1), 76.

Zhang, J. (2005).Corporatism: Its main differences in pluralism (p.122). Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.

Zhou, J. L. (2013). Research on the contractual relationship between government and universities (p.76). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12054

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture