Transcatheter Closure vs Surgical Closure of Ventricular Septal Defect in China: A Meta-Analysis

Tianjin ZHOU, Yaling LUO, Xueqing ZHOU

Abstract


Objective: To compare the curative effect, safety and medical cost of transcatheter closure and surgical closure in ventricular septal defect in China，so as to provide references for treatment plans of ventricular septal defect in clinic medicine.
Methods: Chinese literature databases such as CBM, VIP, CNKI, Wan Fang and English literature databases such as PubMed, Ovid and EBSCO were searched from the date of their establishment to June 2015 for collecting the related articles, the collected articles were screened, extracted, evaluated, and analyzed by using Revman5. 3 software.
Results: 23 articles (16 Chinese articles, 7 English articles) met the inclusion criteria，transcatheter closure (TC) group included 2801 cases，surgical closure (SC) group included 3,086 cases. Meta-analysis results showed as following：(a) operation success rate：TC group was lower than SC group (RR=0.98, 95% CI=0.96~0.99, P = 0.008)；(b) operation complication rate：TC group was lower than SC group (RR=0.62, 95% CI=0.46~0.84, P=0.002)；(c) operation immediate residual shunt rate：TC group was lower than SC group (RR=0.69, 95% CI = 0.51~ 0.95, P=0.02)；(d) operation time：TC group was shorter than SC group (SMD= -2.87, 95% CI = -3.60 ~ -2.13, P<0.00001)；(e) length of hospital stay：TC group was shorter than SC group (SMD= -1.55, 95% CI=-2.14 ~ -0.95, P<0.00001)；(6) hospitalization expenses：TC group was higher than SC group (SMD=1.02, 95% CI=0.12~1.93, P=0.03).
Conclusion: TC is lower than SC in operation success rate，operation complication rate and operation immediate residual shunt rate; and TC is shorter than SC in operation time and length of hospital stay；but TC is higher than SC in the hospitalization expenses. Thus, transcatheter closure can be used as an alternative to surgical treatment in the range of indication.


Keywords


Transcatheter closure; Surgical closure; Ventricular septal defect; Comparion; Meta-analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bass, J. L., & Kalra, A. R, et al. (2009). Initial human experience with the Amplatzer perimembranous ventricular septal occluder device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 58, 238-245.

Butera, G., Chessa, M., & Carminati, M. (2007). Percutaneous closure of ventricular septal defects. Cardiol Young, 17(3), 243-253.

Chen, Y. X., Chen, J. H., & Niu, T., et al. (2010). The therapeutic efficacy of interventional therapy and operation for ventricular septal defect. Ning Xia Med J, 32(12), 1128-1129.

Chen, Z. Y., Lin, B. R., & Chen, W. H., et al. (2014). Percutaneous device occlusion and minimally invasive surgical repair for perimembranous ventricular septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg, 97(4), 1400-1406.

Dai, Z. X, Guan, Y. M., & Cui, X. H., et al. (2005). Comparison of surgery versus domestic- made VSD occluder device implantation in the closure of ventricular septal defects [J]. Chin Heart J, 17( 2), 175-177. (in Chinese)

Hu, Y., Li, Z, & Chen, J., et al. (2015). Results of comparing transthoracic device closure and surgical repair with right infra-axillary thoracotomy for perimembranous ventricular septal defects. Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, 20, 493-498.

Hu, H. B., Jiang, S. L., & Xu, Z.Y., et al. (2004). Comparative study on treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defects by transcatheter closure of VSD and by surgical repair. Chin J Cardiol , 32(5), 398-401. (in Chinese)

Liu, H. M, Hua, Y. M., & Wang, Y. B., et al. (2006). Interventional approach to the treatment of aneurysms of the perimembranous ventricular septal defects. Chinese Journal of Pediatrics, 44(8), 611-615.

Liu, S., Chen, F., & Ding, X., et al. (2012). Comparison of results and economic analysis of surgical and transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 42, 57-162.

Long, K., Shang, X. K., & Song, L. C., et al. (2014). Contrastive research of ventricular septal defect treatment: interventional occlusion using asymmetric occluders and surgical procedures. Chin J Intervent Cardiol, 22(11), 707-709.

Luo, Y. K., Chen, W. H., & Xiong, C., et al. (2015). Comparison of effectiveness and cost between perventricular device occlusion and minimally invasive surgical repair for perimembranous ventricular septal defect. Pediatr Cardiol, 36, 308-313.

Ou, X., Zhang, Z. W., & Qian, M. Y., et al. (2005). Treatment of perimenbranous ventricular septal defect transcatheter occlution vs surgery. Chin J Intervent Cardiol,13(2), 94-96. (in Chinese)

Slim, K., Nini, E., & Forestier, D., et al. (2003). Methodological index for non-randomized studies(minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg, 73(9), 712-716.

Sun, Y., Yu, B., & Hou, J. B., et al. Comparison of transcatheter closure with surgical treatment in ventricular septal defect [J]. Chin J Cardiol, 32(6), 528-529 . (in Chinese)

Wang, S. Q., Li, Z., & Wang, X. G., et al. (2008). Comparison of the effect of transcatheter closure and surgical treatment for ventricular septal defect. Prac J Med＆Pharm, 25(12), 1445-1446.

Wu, D. K., Chen, S. X., & Luo, W. J., et al. (2009). Comparative study on the congenital ventricular septal defect between interventional and surgical procedures. China Journal of Modern Medicine, 19(2), 261-263.

Xia, S. L., & Zhang, Z. W. (2010). Efficacy of transcatheter closure versus surgery repair of congenital ventricular septal defect in children：A mid-term and long-term follow-up result. South China Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases, 16(3), 185-189.

Xiao, Y. Q., Fan, Z. Y., & Fang, H. N., et al. (2008). Comparison of efficacy and cost between transcatheter and surgical closure of secundum perimembranou ventricular septal defect. Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine, 3(4), 311-313. (in Chinese)

Xu, X. L., Wang, M., & He, C. G. (2014). Comparison of efficacy of Amplatzer membrane occluder and open chest operation for the treatment of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. Xinjiang Medical Journal, 44, 53-55.

Xunmin, C., Shisen, J., & Jianbin, G., et al. (2007). Comparison of results and complications of surgical and Amplatzer device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. International Journal of Cardiology, 120, 28-31.

Yang, J., Yang, L., & Yum S., et al. (2014). Transcatheter versus surgical closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63(12), 1159-1168.

Zeng, X. G. (2013). Comparison of curative effect of surgical repair and transcatheter closure of congenital ventricular septal defect. Chin J Mod Drug Appl, 7(3), 62-63

Zhang, H., Sun, S. H, & Yang, X. C, et al. (2006). Retrospective study of interventional occlusion and surgical treatment of membranous ventricular septal defect. Medical Journal of the Chinese People’ s Armed Police Forces, 17(1), 44-45. (in Chinese)

Zhang, G. C., Shen, Q. S., & Shang, X. K., et al. (2013). Contrastive research of VSD treatment: percutaneous interventional occlusion and microinvasive surgical occlusion. Chin J Intervent Cardiol, 21(1), 17-20.

Zheng, Q., Zhao, Z., & Zuo, J., et al. (2009). A comparative study: Early results and complications of percutaneous and surgical closure of ventricular septal defect. Cardiology, 114(4), 238-243.

Zhou, A. Q., & Jiang, S. L. (2004). Guide for interventional treatment of congenital heart disease．Chin J Pediatr, 42( 3), 238-239.

Zhou, N., Guo, Y, L., & Xie, W. K., et al. (2010). Comparison of the treatment of occlusion and surgical treatment for 67 cases of ventricular septal defect in children. Shanxi Medical Journal, 39(9), 1154-1155.

Zhu, Y. M., Sun, X. F., & Xu, Q. C., et al. (2008). Comparison of domestic occluder and surgical repair for the treatment of membranous ventricular septal defect. Journal of Jining Medical College, 31(1), 43-44. (in Chinese)

Zuo, J, Xie, J., & Yi, W., et al. (2010). Results of transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect. Am J Cardiol, 106(7), 1034-1037.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Tianjin ZHOU, Yaling LUO, Xueqing ZHOU

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture