The Progress, Problems and Forsight of Scholarship of Teaching Research in China Since 2000

Xiaohong LI, Yule JIN, Yang LIU

Abstract


Since 2000, Chinese researchers have introduced American ideology of scholarship of teaching (SoT), and conduct localizationas analysis on its definition, connotation and assessing standards, and initially form SoT theoretical framework based on Chinese reality. Researchers have carried out empirical investigations for Chinese SoT levels in universities, and discussed on overall design of Chinese university SoT system from such aspects as SoT cultivating system, value acceptance system, teaching administrative and quality guarantee system based on SoT, teachers’ specialty development system in the view of SoT, and SoT communicating and sharing system. Although SoT research has greatly developed in China, there still exist the following problems: just advocating foreign theories without taking consideration of Chinese context; taking old route in research path; more theoretical imagination but less investigation, many difficulties to implementation recommendation. It will be a tendency for future research to further clarify SoT theoretical foundation, explore the practice from the bottom up and probe into new epistemology and research paradigm applied to SoT.

Keywords


University teaching; Scholarship of teaching; Status quo; Forsight

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boyer, E. L. (2002). Selected speeches. In Y. G. Tu & F. Fang (Trans.). Beijing: Education Science Press.

Bu, D., et al. (2012). Analyzing the way of constructing university system based on the theory of “academic teaching”. Modern Education Science, (6), 78-80.

Chang, X. L. (2011). The establishment of the academic managers in colleges and universitiesteaching concept and university teachers professional development. Education Exploration, (11), 86-88.

Chen, W., & Yi, F. Y. (2010). From the cover to uncover: Teaching academic development analysis of the system. Higher Education Exploration, (4), 73-77.

Fang, X. L. (2010). Reconstruction on the evaluation and appointment system of university teacher’s professional position based on “the scholarship of teaching”. Teacher Education Research, (4), 39-42.

Feng, J. (2010). On the academic training of university teaching. Teacher Education Research, (7), 34-38.

Geng, B. N. (2002). Teaching academic level of university teachers. Degree and Postgraduate Education, (2-3), 60-63.

Han, C. Y. (2013). Regeneration research on academic concept of teachers’ teaching in university. Southwest University.

Han, J. H. (2009). Teaching academic concept and its revelation for the university teachers’ professional development. Jiangxi Social Sciences, (8), 236-239.

Hou, D. K. (2010). Two decades after the publication of Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered: Institutionalization of scholarship of teaching and learning. Fudan Education Forum, (6), 31-37.

Huang, P. S. (2014). On the logic of newly recruited college teachers’ professional development from the perspective of teaching and doing scholarship. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (3), 136-142.

Jiang, X. F., & Peng, Q. Z. (2011). When teaching to be academic—The deep meaning and enlightenment of teaching academic theory. Jiangsu Higher Education, (1), 66-69.

Li, H. (2010). Research and revelation on boyer’s thought of scholarship of teaching. China: Henan University.

Li, Z. Y., & Xu, H. (2007). On the impact and mechanisms of the CFAT to American higher education. Journal of Higher Education, (6), 98-104.

Liu, C. H., & Shi, W. (2008). The defects and countermeasures of college teaching management system—University teaching academic point of view. Journal of Technology College Education, (2), 13-15.65.

Lu, G. S., et al. (2010). An analysis of the types and characteristics of academic work at the university level. Fudan Education Forum, (6), 38-44.

Qi, S. S., & Yao, L. M. (2004). Research on the connotation of the scholarship of teaching. Fudan Education Forum, (6), 28-31.

Schon, D. A. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, 27(6), 26-34.

Shi, J. H., Xu. T., & Li, Y. F. (2011). The current situation of teaching scholarship in China: An empirical study of 44 higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education, (12), 52-66.

Song, Y. (2010). Teaching academic foreign research review. Jiangsu Higher Education, (2), 67-70.

Song, Y. (2011). The teaching of academic and security system research. Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Song, Y. (2013). Analysis on the current situation of the academic level in our university teaching based on the four dimensions. Modern Education Management, (10), 79-83.

Sun, Y. X. (2012). On the standards of monitoring ability of teaching from the perspective of scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal of Hebei University (Philosophy and Social Science), (3), 26-30.

Wang, F. L. (2012). Under the academic perspective of reflection and reconstruction of the teaching evaluation system. Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education, (8), 162-165.

Wang, R. M. (2012). The study of the university teaching academic evaluation method. Jiangsu Higher Education, (5), 95-96.

Wang, X. Y. (2010). From extreme to balance, construct a new academic paradigm—The development of academic thought of trajectory theory of university teaching. Modern Education Science, (2), 109-112.

Wang, Y. H. (2006). A new trend of university culture in the U.S.—Faculty development from focusing on major development to students learning. Studies in Foreign Education, (5), 51-53.

Wang, Y. H. (2006). Let teaching and learning become common wealth: Shulman’s thoughts on scholarship of teaching and learning. Comparative Education Review, (5), 51-53.

Wang, Y. H. (2008). The carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching: The promoter of the SOTL movement in the U.S.A. Higher Education Research and Evaluation, (5), 57-62.

Wei, G. (2014). Scholarship of teaching at first-class universities in China: An empirical study on Peking university. Fudan Education Forum, (2), 34-41.

Xiang, C. (2011). Based on the teaching of academic internal quality assurance system of college teaching building. Heilongjiang Education (Higher Education Research & Appraisal), (8), 4-7.

Yang, C. (2014). The institutional environment and government approaches of university scholarship of teaching development. Modern Education Management, (3), 51-55.

Yao, L. M. (2010). The scholarship of teaching and learning and its value. Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences), (4), 102-106.

Yao, L. M., et al. (2006). The ways for the university faculty becoming the faculty of the scholarship of teaching. University Education Science, (5), 41-45.

Yu, X., & Yu, Q. (2000). To enhance the teaching academic level of university teachers. China Higher Education, (13-14), 25-27.

Zhang, Q. Z. (2011). College teachers teaching academic evaluation problem. Higher Education Exploration, (4), 71-74.

Zhou, X. H., Huang, Y., & Ma, X. K. (2011). A study on the appraisal system of scholarship of teaching based on the 9-elements model. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University(Social Science), (7), 375-376.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Xiaohong LI, Yule JIN, Yang LIU

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture