Cross-Cultural Communication
Administrative Litigation Plaintiff Qualification in Germeny: Enlightenment to Chinese Law
Abstract
German Administrative Litigation System is relatively complete. This chapter starts from the background of German administrative litigation, which analyzes its main objective of "rights violations" standard specifically identified under the subjective litigation and in objective litigation the plaintiff Qualification are in group litigation, litigation and regulating authorities review proceedings. Its value of administrative proceedings, classifications of litigation are affecting the development of the scope of the plaintiff's administrative litigation system. The author clarifies the main proceedings of Administrative Litigation, supplements objective function and improves the scope of the case. Furthermore, the author clarifies its set standards in Plaintiff Qualification of Administrative Litigation and brings public interest litigation into administrative litigation system to enable citizens, public interest groups and the prosecution have the administrative public interest litigation to sue.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cai, Z. F. (2001). New theory of administrative relief law (2nd ed., p.225). Yuanzhao Publishing Company.
Di, J. (2010). Changes in public law (p.140) (G. Zheng, Trans.). China Legal Publishing House[France]
Friedel, H. H. (2003). Administrative procedure law (pp.370-378) (G. H. Mo, Trans.). Law Press. [Germany]
Hu, J. M. (1998). Comparative administrative law: A review of administrative law in 20 countries (p.306). Beijing, China: Law Press.
Huang, X. X. (2006). On the qualification of plaintiff in administrative litigation. Law, (8), 5.
Jiang, B. X., & Liang, F. Y. (2001). Theory and practice of administrative procedure law (p.337). Beijing, China: Peking University Press.
Jiang, B. X., & Liang, F. Y. (2009). Theory and practice of administrative procedure law (p.680). Peking University Press.
Jiang, B. X., & Liang, F. Y. (2009). Theory and practice of administrative procedure law (p.343). Peking University Press.
Klöpfer, M. (1994). Zur Geschichter des deutschen Umweltrechts. Duncker & Humbolt GmbH, S81. [Germany]
Kong, F. M. (2012). On organ litigation as an objective litigation. Journal of Nanjing University of Technology, 11(2), 42.
Li, H. Z. (2002). A study on the system of organ dispute in German local autonomy law. New Theory of Contemporary Public Law, (2), 217. China: Yuanzhao Publishing Company.
Liang, F. Y. (2006). Some theoretical premises of administrative litigation modification - From the perspective of objective litigation and subjective litigation. Application of Law, (5), 72.
Lin, L. H., & Ma, L. Q. (2011). Administrative public interest litigation as an objective litigation. Research on Administrative Law, (4), 3.
Lin, W. Z. (2010). On the legal system of administrative litigation between the two sides of the taiwan straits - Centered on the types of litigation (p.117). Master’s Thesis 2010, Department of Law, Soochow University.
Liu, F. (2004). An analysis of the type system of administrative litigation - From the perspective of German law. Law, (3), 44.
Liu, F. (2013). The function of administrative litigation type system. Law Research, 5, p.61.
Lüthge, J. (1980). Die Verbandsklage im Bremischen Naturschutzgesetz. NJW, S.1036-1038. [Germany]
Roth, W. (2001). Verwaltungsgerechtliche organstreitigkeiten. Verlag Duncker & Humblot Berlin, S.153. [Germany]
Sarwey, O. von (1880). Das öffentliche Recht und die Verwaltungsrechtspflege. Verlag Laupp Tübingen, S. 73. [Germany]
Wang, M. Y. (1988). French administrative law (p.664). China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Wöhrling, J-M. (1985). Die französische Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit im Vergleich mit der deutschen. NVwZ, S. 464. [France]
Xue, G. L., & Yang, X. (2013). On the structure of administrative litigation in China: Subjective litigation or objective litigation?. Research on Administrative Law, (4), 35.
Zhao, H. (2011). On the basic rights as objective values and their problems. Political and Legal Forum, 29(2), 58.
Zhao, H. (2011). Subjective rights and objective values - Two facets of fundamental rights in German law. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (3), 38.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11615
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Hong Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Remind
We are currently accepting submissions via email only.
The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.
Please send your manuscripts to ccc@cscanada.net，or ccc@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
