Current Status of Adolescents Parental Monitoring and Its Effects on Social Adjustment

Jianquan JIANG

Abstract


With 1,162 middle school students as the participants, the questionnaire method is used to observe parental monitoring of adolescents and the relationship between parental monitoring of adolescents and social adjustment and Neuroticism is discussed. Results: (a) Parental monitoring of adolescents has significant differences in grade and gender: girls are significantly greater than boys in parental knowledge degree of adolescents; and in parental negative control of adolescents, boys are significantly greater than girls; but in autonomy granting, the gender difference is non-significant. What’s more, the tendency is shown on the three styles of parental monitoring that the higher the grade is, the lower the score is. (b) Parental monitoring of adolescents can be divided into democratic style, authoritative style and indulgent style, and the proportions of which adolescents are 38%, 30% and 32% separately. (c) The differences of adolescents under different types of parental monitoring on the eight styles of social adjustment reach the extremely significant level. (4) Neuroticism has significant regulating effects on the relationship between parental monitoring and adolescents’negative adjustment.


Keywords


Parental monitoring; Social adjustment; Neuroticism; Adolescents

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & IJzendoorm, M. H. (2007). Genetic vulnerability or differential susceptibility in child development: The case of attachment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychaiatry, 48(12), 1160-1173.

Barber, B. K., Olsen, J. E., & Shagle, S. C. (1994). Associations between parental psychological and behavioral control and youth internalized and externalized behaviors. Child Development, 65(4), 1120-1136.

Bean, R. A., Barber, B. K., & Grane, D. R. (2006). Parental support, behavioral control, and psychlolgical control among African-American youth: The relationships to academic grades, Delinquency and depression. Journal of Family Issues, 27(10), 1335-1355.

Belsky, J. (2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influence: An evolutionary hypothesis and some evidence. In B. Ellis & D. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp.139-163). New York: Guilford.

Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions In Psychological Science, 16(6), 300-305.

Belsky, J. (1997). Variation in susceptibility torearing influence: An evolutionary argument. Psychlolgical Inquiry, 8, 182-186.

Crosby, R. A., DiClemente, R. J., & Wingood, G. M. (2002). Low parental monitoring predicts subsequent pregnancy among African-American adolescent females. Pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 15, 43-46.

Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical, Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 61-75.

Fang, X. Y. (1995). Mother-child attachment, parental monitoring and adolescents’smoking and drink behaviors. Psychological Development and Education, 32(3), 54-59.

Gallagher, K. C. (2002). Does child temperament moderate the influence of parenting on adjustment? Developmental Review, 22, 623-643.

Hirsch, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of Adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366-380.

Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Parents “monitoring-relevant knowledge and adolescents” delinquent behavior evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Development, 74(3), 752-768.

Lin, S. (2001). The influence of family connection, regulation,and psychology control on Chinese adolescent development (PhD thesis). University of Nebraska.

Liu, Q. (2006). The developing characteristics of adolescents’ autonomy in affection and its relationship with negative control, autonomy granting and parent-child attachment (Master degree dissertation). Beijing: Beijing Normal University.

McAdams, D. P., Anyidoho, N. A., Brown, C., Huang, Y. T., Kaplan, B., & Machado, M. A. (2004). Traits and stories: Links between dispositional and narrative features of personality. Journal of Personality, 72(4), 761-784.

Morris, A. S., Steinberg, L., Sessa, F. M., et al. (2001). Measuring children’s perceptions ofpsychological control: Developmental and conceptual considerations. In B. K. Barber (Ed.), Intrusive parenting: How psychological control affects children and adolescents (pp.125-159). Washingto, DC: American Psychological Association.

Nie, Y. G., Lin, C. D., Zheng, X., Ding, L., & Peng, Y. S. (2008). The relationship between adolescent social adaptive behavior and the “big-five” personality. Psychological Science, 31(4), 774-779.

Pettit, G. S., Laird, R. D., Dodge, K. A., Bate, J. E., & Crisis, M. M. (2001). Antecedents and behavior-problem outcomes of parental monitoring and psychological control in early adolescence. Child Development,72(2), 583-598.

Qu, Z. Y., & Zou, H. (2008). Family environment, parental monitoring and juvenile delinquency. China Youth Study, 4, 35-40.

Qu, Z. Y., & Zou, H. (2009). Family environment, parental monitoring, self-control and juvenile delinquency. Psychological Science, 32(2), 360-363.

Shek, D. T. L. (2007). A longitudinal study of perceived parental psychological control and psychological well-being in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 63(1), 1-22.

Silk, S. J., Morris, A., Kanaya, T., & Sternbarg, L. (2003). Psychological control and autonomy granting: Opposite ends of a continuum or distinct constructs? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 113-128.

Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71(4), 1072-1085.

Yu, Y. B. (2009). Assessment of middle school students’social adjustment and its family risk and protective factors. Doctoral Dissertation of Beijing Normal University.

Zou, H. (2003). Adoloscents’ peer relationship—developing characteristics, function and its influencing factors. Beijing Normal University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jianquan JIANG

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; sss@cscanada.net; sss@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Sociology of Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures