Doctors’ Pragmatic Identity Construction Based on The Doctors

Chenlu ZENG, Fang GUO

Abstract


In recent years, conflicts between doctors and patients in China have occurred from time to time. In the past, some scholars conducted research on the doctor-patient relationship, but there are few studies on doctors’ pragmatic identity construction. Therefore, guided by Chen Xinren’s pragmatic identity theory, using python as an analytical aid, this paper uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis to conduct a study of doctor’s pragmatic identity construction based on a medical documentary The Doctors. The main focus of this study is not only the types of pragmatic identity constructed by doctors in the documentary, but also the emotional characteristics of these pragmatic identities. According to this research, the doctors in the documentary The Doctors mainly construct expert identity, peer identity, and stress bearer identity. The overall emotional characteristics of the constructed pragmatic identities are neutral, and positive emotions are greater than negative ones. This paper has certain research significance. For one thing, this study provides a new research perspective for doctors’ pragmatic identity construction, that is, to study the overall emotional characteristics of the constructed identities. For another, this study can help the public understand the pragmatic identity of doctors to a certain extent, and promote the harmonious relationship between doctors and patients.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. C., (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bramley, N. R. (2001). Pronouns of politics: The use of pronouns in the construction of “self” and “other” in political interviews. Canberra: Australian National University.

Chen, X. R. (2013a). Pragmatic identity: Dynamic choice and discursive construction. Foreign Languages Research, 140(4), 27-32.

Chen, X. R. (2013b). Pragmatic explorations in identity and communication. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

Chen, X. R. (2014). Current research on identity from the pragmatic perspective: Key issues and main approaches. Modern Foreign Languages, 37(5), 702-705.

Chen, X. R. (2018). Pragmatic identity: How to do things with words of identity. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.

Have, P. T. (1991). Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor-patient interaction, In D. Bodel & D. H. Zirnrnennan (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (Vol. II, pp.138-163). Cambridge: Polity Press.

He, Z. R., & Ran, Y. P. (2009). Introduction to pragmatics. Changsha: Hunan Education Press.

Ji, X. Y. (2020). Research on doctor identity construction from the perspective of multimodal discourse analysis theory. Journal of Western. (01), 151-153.

Jiang, Q. S. (2019). Studies of pragmatic identity in the last decade: Five theoretical approaches and methodologies. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). 214(1), 57-63, 169.

Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.

Liu, L. L. (2015). A pragmatic approach to doctors’ identity construction in medical discourse: A case study of Grey’s anatomy. Shandong Normal University. DOI:10.7666/d.D695671.

May, C. (2007). The clinical encounter and the problem of context. Sociology, 41(1), 29-45.

Tracy, K. & Robles, J. S., (2013). Every day talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford Press.

Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday Talk: Building and Reflecting Identities. London: Guilford Press.

Wang, X., You, Y., & Ji, C. E., (2017). Research paths and methods of the construction of doctors’ identity in my country. Chongqing Medicine, 46(29), 4169-4170.

Xia, Y. Q. (2017). On the construction of doctors’ identities in cyber space. Medicine & Philosophy, 38(09), 43-47.

Yuan, Z. M., & Chen, X. R. (2013). A study of pragmatic identity construction from the perspective of linguistic adaptation theory——A case study of medical consultation. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 45(04), 518-530, 640.

Zhao, Y. Y., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2010). Sentiment analysis. Journal of Software, 21(08), 1834-1848.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Chenlu Zeng

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share us to:   

 

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/sll/submission/wizard


Reminder

How to do online submission to another Journal?

If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; sll@cscanada.net; sll@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Literature and Language are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 STUDIES IN LITERATURE AND LANGUAGE Editorial Office

Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail: office@cscanada.net; office@cscanada.org; caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture