ImprovingLaboratory Performance in Healthcare Delivery Systems through Optimal Stage Selection: The Analytic Network Process Approach

Laquanda Leaven

Abstract


Laboratory services in healthcare delivery systems play a vital role in inpatient care. Laboratory testing alone accounts for approximately 10% of hospital billing. A goal for the U.S managed healthcare delivery system is to considerably reduce laboratory costs. To aid in achieving this goal, a research study is performed that focuses on the optimization of a clinical laboratory in a local hospital system. This paper shows how the analytic network process (ANP) model can be applied in assessing and ranking the three stages of the laboratory process to determine the stage that is most critical for optimization purposes. Once the most critical stage is identified and optimized significant cost savings can be achieved. The final results of the ANP model in this study indicate the preanalytical stage is the most critical among the three stages in the laboratory process.


Keywords


Hospital; Laboratory; Stage; Analytic network process

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carter, K. J., Ritchey, N. P., Castro, F., Caccamo, L. P., Kessler, E., & Erickson, B. A. (1999). Analysis of three decision-making methods. Medical Decision Making, 19(1), 49-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989x9901900107

Carraro, P., & Plebani, M. (2007). Errors in a stat laboratory: types and frequencies 10 years later. Clinical Chemistry, 53(7), 1338-1342.

Dolan, J. G., & Bordley, D. R. (1994). Isoniazid prophylaxis. Medical Decision Making, 14(1), 1-8.

Elder, B. L. (2008). Six Sigma in the Microbiology Laboratory. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 30(19), 143-147.

Hollensead, S. C., & Lockwood, W. B., et al. (2004). Errors in pathology and laboratory medicine: Consequences and prevention. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 88(3), 161-181.

Howanitz, P. J. (2005). Errors in laboratory medicine: Practical lessons to improve patient safety. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 129(10), 1252-1261.

Hummel, J. M., & Snoek, G. J., et al. (2005). A multicriteria decision analysis of augmentative treatment of upper limbs in persons with tetraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev., 42(5), 635-644.

Maheshwarkar, M., & Sohani, N. (2013). Combined AHP-TOPSIS based approach for the evaluation of knowledge sharing capabilities of supply chain partners. Management Science & Engineering, 7(3).

Melanson, S. E. F., & Goonan, E. M., et al. (2009). Applying Lean/Toyota production system principles to improve phlebotomy patient satisfaction and workflow. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 132(6), 914-919.

Pansini, N., & Di Serio, F., et al. (2003). Total testing process: Appropriateness in laboratory medicine. Clinica Chimica Acta, 333(2), 141-145.

Persoon, T. J., & Zaleski, S., et al. (2006). Improving preanalytic processes using the principles of lean production (Toyota Production System). American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 125(1), 16-25.

Plebani, M. (2009). Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clinica Chimica Acta, 404(1), 16-23.

Plebani, M. (1999). The clinical importance of laboratory reasoning. Clinica Chimica Acta, 280(1-2), 35-45. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(98)00196-x

Raab, S. S. (2006). Improving patient safety through quality assurance. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 130(5), 633-637.

Rossetti, M. D., & Selandari, F. (2001). Multi-objective analysis of hospital delivery systems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 41(3), 309-333.

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (1998). Diagnosis with dependent symptoms: Bayes theorem and the

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006). Decision making with the analytic network process. Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.

Serrano, L., & Hegge, P., et al. (2010). Using LEAN principles to improve quality, patient safety, and workflow in histology and anatomic pathology. Advances in Anatomic Pathology, 17(3), 215-221 210.1097/PAP.1090b1013e3181d1098c1081.

Singh, S., & Dolan, J., et al. (2006). Optimal management of adults with pharyngitis – A multi-criteria decision analysis. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6(1), 1-13.

Vegting, I. L., & van Beneden, M., et al. (2012). How to save costs by reducing unnecessary testing: Lean thinking in clinical practice. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 23(1), 70-75.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/4319

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Share us to:   

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; mse@cscanada.net; mse@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Management Science and Engineering are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Editorial Office

Address:1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures