Identification of Misconceptions in the Teaching of Biology: A Pedagogical Cycle of Recognition, Reduction and Removal
Abstract
To date research into how young people acquire accurate higher-order scientific knowledge, and gain an understanding of abstract and challenging concepts in science, has occupied much of the science education literature across countries and across continents. In previous studies, we identified that biology teaching that involves the diagnosis, reduction and elimination of misconceptions can be one effective pedagogic approach, particularly if positioned within a ‘good enough’ model of pedagogic practice . In this study, we investigate the use of one diagnostic testing approach to the identification of misconceptions in the teaching of respiration and photosynthesis in a small sample of secondary school students (n=139) and pre-service teachers (n=43) in the Republic of Ireland. Photosynthesis and respiration were chosen as they are prevalent biology topics that students find conceptually challenging. The study used test items to elicit the extent of misconceptions among this cohort – a paper-and-pencil test for students and a survey instrument for pre-service teachers. The findings show unacceptably high level of misconceptions among all pre-service teachers and students and suggest that diagnostic tests of this type can be a useful entry point to a pedagogical cycle for the recognition, reduction and removal of misconceptions. The findings have wider implications than this small scale study and are primarily directed toward new understandings in relation to more effective models of biology teaching and teacher education.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abimbola, I. O., & Baba, S. (1996). Misconceptions & alternative conceptions in science textbooks: The role of teachers as filters. The American Biology Teacher, 58(1), 14-19.
Angell, C., Ryder, J., & Scott, P. (2005). Becoming an expert teacher: Novice physics teachers’ development of conceptual and pedagogical knowledge. Studies in Science Education.
Asay, L. D., & Orgill, M. K. (2010). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in The Science Teacher ‘1998–2007’. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 57-79.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228.
Bell, E. (2001). The future of education in the molecular life sciences. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2(3), 221–225.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement. Ethics, Politics, Democracy. London: Paradigm.
Bradley, J., Croker, S., Zimmerman, C., Gill, D., & Romig, C. (2013). Gaming science: The ‘Gamification’ of scientific thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(607), 1-16.
Burgoon, J. N., Heddle, M. L. & Duran, E. (2011). Re-examining the similarities between teacher and student conceptions about physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 859-872.
Clement, J., & Brown, D. (2004). Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: Abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction. Instructional Science, 18(4), 237-261.
Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners’ mental models of ionic bonding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 464-486.
Connell, R. (2009). Good teachers on dangerous ground: Toward a new view of teacher quality and professionalism. Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 213-229.
Deshmukh, N. D., & Deshmukh. V. M. (2007). A study of students’ misconceptions in biology at the secondary school level: Proceedings of epiSTEME-2. An International Conference to Review Research on Science, Technology and Mathematics Education (137-141). Delhi, India: Macmillan India Ltd.
Diakidoy, I. A., & Iordanou, K. (2003). Pre-service teachers and teachers’ conceptions of energy and their ability to predict pupils’ level of understanding. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(1), 357–36.
Dikmenli, M., & Cardak, O. (2004). A study on misconceptions in the 9th grade high school biology textbooks. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 17(1), 130-141.
Donovan, M., & Bransford, J. (2005). How students learn science in the classroom. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
Garnett, P. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1990). Implications of research on students’ understanding of electrochemistry for improving Science curricula and classroom practice. International Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 147-156.
Gooding, J., & Metz., B. (2011). From misconceptions to conceptual change. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 34-37.
Griffard, P. B., & Wandersee, J. H. (2001). The two-tier instrument on Photosynthesis: What does it diagnose?. International Journal of Science Education, 23(10), 1039-1052.
Güler, D., & Yağbsan., R. (2008). The description of problems relating to analogies used in science and technology textbooks. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 9(16), 105-122.
Hershey, D. R. (2004). Avoid misconceptions when teaching about plants. Website http://www.actionbioscience.org/education/hershey. html [accessed 23 July 2013].
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor & Francis.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Maximizing impact on learning. London and New York: Routledge.
Hattie, J., & G. Yates. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. London: Routledge.
Hodgson, C., & Pyle, K. (2010). A Literature review of Assessment for Learning in science. National Foundation for Educational Research.
Keeley, P., Eberle, F.， & Farrin, L. (2005). Uncovering student ideas in science: 25 formative assessment probes. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
Johnson, A. M., & Lawson, E. A. (1998). What are the relative effects of reasoning ability and prior knowledge on Biology achievement in expository and inquiry classes?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 89-103.
Karamustafaog˘lu, S., Sevim, S., Mustafaog˘lu, O., & Cepni, S. (2003). Analysis Turkish high-school chemistry examination questions according to bloom’s taxonomy. Chem Educ Res Pract, 4(1), 25–30.
Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based Science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 631-645.
Kendeou, P., & Van den Broek, P. (2008). Cognitive processes in comprehension of science texts: The role of co-activation in confronting misconceptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 335-351.
Kern, C., & Crippen, K. J. (2008). Mapping for conceptual change. Science Teacher, 75(6), 32-38.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp. J. E., eds. (2011). Designing effective instruction, 6 ed., Hoboken: John Wiley and sons.
Scott, P.H., Asoko, A. H., & Driver, R. H. (1997). Teaching for conceptual change: A review of srategies children’s learning in Science. Research Group University of Leeds, UK.
Smith, J. P. I., Disessa, A. A. & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.
Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 19(5), 437-454.
Luft, J. A., Roehrig, G. H., & Patterson, N. C. (2003). Contrasting landscape: A comparison of the impact of different induction programs on beginning secondary science teachers’ practices, beliefs, and experiences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 77 - 97.
Modell, H., Michael, J., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2005). Helping the learner to learn: The role of uncovering misconceptions. The American Biology Teacher, 67(1), 20-26.
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Practice, 41(1), 226–232.
National Research Council. (1997). Science teaching reconsidered: A handbook. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Sheehan, M. (2010). Identification of difficult topics in the teaching and learning of chemistry in Irish schools and the development of an intervention programme to target some of these difficulties (Master’s thesis). Published by University of Limerick.
Ross, P., Tronson, D., & Raymond, J. R. (2006). Modelling photosynthesis to increase conceptual understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 84-88.
Songer, C. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1994). Understanding cellular respiration: An analysis of conceptual change in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 621-637.
Penso, S., Shoman, E., & Shiloah, N. (2001). First steps in novice teachers' activity. Teacher Development, 5(3), 323 - 338.
Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, 177-210. New York: Macmillan.
Young, M. & Muller, J. (2011). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11-27.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/6519
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c)
Share us to: 
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; hess@cscanada.net; hess@cscanada.org
Articles published in Higher Education of Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
HIGHER EDUCATION OF SOCIAL SCIENCE Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Center of Sciences and Cultures 
