Development and Changes of the Value Orientation of the Finality of Awards System of International Commercial Arbitration

Zhaohua MENG

Abstract


With the influence of the concepts such as “business field is battleground” and “time is money”, as one of the most important methods for resolving international economic disputes, international commercial arbitration’s effectiveness has always been recognized as the significant advantage of arbitration in resolving disputes compared with litigations. This paper points out the value deficiency of finality of awards system in arbitration under modern social background after analyzing the value orientation of finality of awards system. After analyzing why international arbitration has become the primary choice for resolving international economic disputes in a deeper scale, this paper explains that finality of awards system is not absolute correct and should compromise with the development of time.


Keywords


Finality of awards system; Efficiency; Impartiality; Neutrality; Convenience

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bodenheimer, E. (1999). Jurisprudence: The philosophy and method of the law (Z. L. Deng, Trans.). Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.

Brownlie, I. (2002). Public international law theory (L. L. Zeng et al. Trans.). Law Press China.

Chen, Z. D. (1998). International commercial arbitration law. Law Press China.

Golding, M. P. (1987). Law philosophy (H. B. Qi, Trans.). Sanlian Bookstore.

Knull, III, W. H., & Rubins, N. D. (2000). Betting the farm on international arbitration: Is it time to offer an appeal option? The American Review of International Arbitration, (11), 531.

Li, J. (2005). Preliminary study on the cost advantages of international commercial arbitration. Journal of Hubei Institute for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (1), 83.

Liang, X. (2001). International law (2nd ed.). Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.

Rawls, J. (1988). A theory of justice. China Social Sciences Publishing Houes.

Redfern, A., Hunter, M., & Blackaby, N. (2005). International commercial arbitration law and practice (4th ed.) (Y. F. Lin & L. B. Song, Trans.). Beijing: Peking University Press.

Schmitthoff, C. M. (1996). Selected articles of international trade law (X. W. Zhao, Trans.). Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.

Xie, S. S. (2003). Commercial arbitration law. Beijing: Higher Education Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720130906.2972

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture