Beyond Age and Adjustment: A Cross-National Qualitative Study of Older Adults’ Perceptions

Sofia von Humboldt, Isabel Leal, Filipa Pimenta, Georgeta Niculescu

Abstract


Aims: To explore the older adults’ perceptions of age and aging, focusing on adjustment to aging (AtA) and subjective age (SA). Methods: This cross-national and qualitative study comprised demographics and semistructured interviews. Complete information on 151 older adults aged between 75-101 years (M = 84.6; SD = 6.905) from Portugal, Romania Angola was available. Data was subjected to content analysis. Results: The most predominant response of the interviewed participants for indicators of AtA was ‘existential meaning’ (26.3%), whilst ‘balanced’ (36.5%) was identified as the most prevalent SA response. In total, five categories were identified to be indicative of AtA: ‘sense of purpose and ambitions’, ‘health and wellness’, ‘social support’, ‘stability and accessibility’ and ‘existential meaning’ whereas, four categories were identified for SA: ‘balanced, ‘old’, ‘youthful’ and ‘dissatisfied’. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for a better understanding of what defines AtA and SA among the elderly. Furthermore, health care providers’ awareness of older adults’ conceptualizations will allow them to communicate more effectively and to reinforce aging well among older populations.

Key words: Adjustment to aging; Subjective age; aging well; Older adults; Content analysis


Keywords


Adjustment to aging, Subjective age, aging well, Older adults, Content analysis

References


Allemand, M., Zimprich, D., & Hendriks, A. A. J. (2008). Age differences in five personality domains across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 758-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.758

Al-Janabi, H. N., Flynn, T., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research, 21(1), 167-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9927-2

Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1993). Psychological perspectives on successful ageing: the model of selective optimization with compensation. In: Baltes PB, Baltes MM, (Eds.), Successful Aging: Perspectives From the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665684.003

Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology, 49, 123–135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000067946

Barak, B. (2009). Age identity: A cross-cultural global approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 2–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025408099485

Bauer, J. J., & McAdams, D. P. (2004). Growth goals, maturity, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 40(1), 114–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.1.114

Birren, J. E., & Schaie, K. W. (1996). Handbook of the psychology of aging. San Diego: Academic Press.

Bowling, A. (2007). Aspirations for older age in the 21st century: What is successful aging? International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 64, 263-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/L0K1-87W4-9R01-7127

Brandtstädter, J., & Renner, G. (1990). Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: Explication and age-related analysis of assimilation and accommodation strategies of coping. Psychology and Aging, 5, 58-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.5.1.58

Brandtstädter, J., Wentura, D., & Greve, W. (1993). Adaptive resources of the aging self: Outlines of an emergent perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 323-349.

Brodsky, S. L. (1988). The psychology of adjustment and well-being. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Brozek, J. (1966). Symposium on adjustment to aging. Applied Psychology, 15, 22–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1966.tb00581.x

Coupland, J., Coupland, N., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1991). Formulating age: Dimensions of age identity in elderly talk. Discourse Processes, 14(1), 87–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544776

Corner, L., Brittain, K., & Bond, J. (2007). Social aspects of ageing. Psychiatry, 6(12), 480-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1383/psyt.3.12.5.56782

Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2007). GeroPsychology. European Perspectives for and Ageing World. Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.

Fernández-Ballesteros, R. (2010). Quality of life in old age: Problematic issues. Applied Research Quality Life, 6, 21–40.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-010-9110-x

Filion, P., Wister, A., & Coblentz, E. J. (1993). Subjective dimensions of environmental adaptation among the elderly. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 10, 3-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J081v10n01_02

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.

Ford, A. B., Haug, M. R., Stange, K. C., Gaines, A. D., Noelker, L. S., & Jones, P. K. (2000). Sustained personal autonomy: a measure of successful aging. Journal Aging Health,12, 470-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089826430001200402

Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13(4), 531-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.531

Gavrilov, L. A., & Heuveline, P. (2003). Aging of Population. In P. Demeny and G. McNicoll (Eds.) The Encyclopedia of Population. New York: Macmillan Reference USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8356-3_6

Giles, H., McIlrath, M., Mulac, A., & McCann, R. M. (2012). Expressing age salience: three generations’ reported events, frequencies, and valences. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 206, 73-96 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2010.049

Haas, S. A., Krueger, P. M., & Rohlfsen, L. (2012). Race/ethnic and nativity disparities in later life physical performance: the role of health and socioeconomic status over the life course. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B(2), 238-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr155

Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.4.731

Heidrich, S. M., & Ryff, C. D. (1993). The role of social comparisons processes in the psychological adaptation of elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 48, 127–136.

Hurd, L. C. (2000). Older women’s body image and embodied experience: An exploration. Journal of Women and Aging, 12, 77-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J074v12n03_06

Instituto Nacional de Estatística. (2000). As gerações mais idosas [The older generations]. Lisboa: DECP /Serviço de estudos sobre a população.

Jopp, D. & Rott. C. (2006). Adaptation in very old age: exploring the role of resources, beliefs, and attitudes for centenarians’ happiness. Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 266–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.266

Kesebir, P., & Diener, E. (2010). In pursuit of happiness: Empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 117–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01066.x

Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.1007

Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, A., Kotter-Grühn, D., & Smith, J. (2008). Self-perceptions of aging: Do subjective age and satisfaction with aging change during old age? Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63B(6), 377–385.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.6.P377

Knight, T., & Ricciardelli, L. A. (2003). Successful aging: perceptions of adults aged between 70 and 101 years. International Journal Aging and Human Development, 56, 223-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/CG1A-4Y73-WEW8-44QY

Kotter-Grühn, D., Grühn, D., & Smith, J. (2010).Predicting one’s own death: the relationship between subjective and objective nearness to death in very old age. European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 293-300.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0165-1

Krueger, P. M., & Burgard, S. A. (2011). Work, occupation, income, and mortality. In. R. G. Rogers & E. M. Crimmins (Eds.), International Handbook of Adult Mortality (pp. 263-288). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9996-9_13

Kuh, D. (2007). New Dynamics of Ageing Preparatory Network. A life course approach to healthy aging, frailty, and capability. Journal Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences Medical Sciences, 62(7), 717-721.

Lang, F. (2001). Regulation of social relationships in later adulthood. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56B(6), 321-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/56.6.P321

Low, G., & Molzahn, A. E. (2007). Predictors of quality of life in old age: A cross-validation study. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(2), 141-50.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20178

MacKinlay, E. (2001). The spiritual dimension of caring: applying a model for spiritual tasks of ageing. Journal of Religious Gerontology, 12(3/4), 151-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J078v12n03_12

Meuller, P. S., Plevak, D. J., & Rummans, T. A. (2001). Religious involvement, spirituality and medicine: Implications for clinical practice. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76, 1225–1235. http://dx.doi.org/10.4065/76.12.1225

Montepare, J. M. (2009). Subjective age: Toward a guiding lifespan framework. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33(1), 42–46.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025408095551

Neri, A. L., Cachioni, M. & Resende, M. C. (2002). Atitudes em relação à velhice [Attitudes towards old age]. In Freitas, E. V., Py, L., Neri, A. L., Cançado, F. A. X., Gorzoni, M. L., Rocha, S. M. Tratado de Geriatria e Gerontologia. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara-Koogan, p. 972-980.

Oerlemans, W. G. M., Bakker, A. B, & Veenhoven, R. (2011). Finding the key to happy aging: A day reconstruction study of happiness. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66B(6), 665-674.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr040

Pampel, F. C., Krueger, P. M., & Denney, J. T. (2010). Socioeconomic disparities in health behaviors. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 349-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102529

Palmore, E. B. (2001). The ageism survey: First findings. Gerontologist, 41(5), 572-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.572

Park, D. C., Gutchess, A. H., Meade, M. L., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2007). Improving cognitive function in older adults: Nontraditional approaches. Journals of Gerontology: Series B (62B), 45–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.special_issue_1.45

Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2004). The subjective evaluation of well-being in adulthood: Findings and implications. Ageing International, 29(2), 113–135.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12126-004-1013-4

Popa, A. (2000). The social perception of the elder. Between objectivity and distortion - Exploratory Study. Quality of life, 12, 91-100.

Reichstadt, J., Sengupta, G., Depp C. A., Palinkas, L. A., & Jeste, D. V. (2010). Older adults’ perspectives on successful aging: Qualitative interviews. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(7), 567-75.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,719–727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719

Shmotkin, D. (1998). Declarative and differential aspects of subjective well-being and implications for mental health in later life. In J. Lomranz (Ed.), Handbook of aging and mental health: An integrative approach (pp. 15–43). New York: Plenum.

Slangen-Dekort, Y. A. W., Midden, J. B. C., Aarts, B., & Wagenberg, F. V. (2001). Determinants of adaptive behavior among older persons: Self-efficacy, importance, and personal disposition as directive mechanisms. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 53(4), 253-274.

Sneed, J. R., & Whitbourne, S. K. (2003). Identity processing and self-consciousness in middle and later adulthood. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 58(6), 313-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.6.P313

Staudinger, U. M., & Kunzmann, U. (2005). Positive adult personality development: adjustment and/or growth? European Psychologist, 10(4), 320–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10. 4.320

Stephan, Y., Caudroit, J., & Chalabaev. A. (2011). Subjective health and memory self-efficacy as mediators in the relation between subjective age and life satisfaction among older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 15(4), 428–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.536138

Stevens-Ratchford, R. G. (2005). Occupational engagement: Motivation for older adult participation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 21(23), 171-181.

Thomae, T. (1992). Contributions of longitudinal research to a cognitive theory of adjustment to aging. European Journal of Personality, 6(2), 157–175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410060207

Tornstam, L. (2005). Gerotranscendence: A developmental theory of positive aging. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

Torres, S. (2003). A preliminary empirical test of a culturally-relevant theoretical framework for the study of successful aging. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 18(1), 79-100.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (1999). The world population prospects: the 1998 revision. New York: Author.

United Nations. (2009). World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision. CD-ROM Edition - Extended Dataset, United Nations.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2011). World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision. New York: Author.

United States Bureau of the Census. (2000). International Data Base (IDB). International Program Center, Washington DC. http://www.census.gov/ipc/ www/idbnew.html

von Humboldt, S., Leal, I., & Pimenta, F. (2012). Assessing subjective age and adjustment to aging in a Portuguese and German older population: A comparative multiple correspondence analysis. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(2), 141-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v4n2p141

Westerhof, G. J., & Barrett, A. E. (2005). Age identity and subjective well-being: A comparison of the United States and Germany. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60B(3), 129-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.3.S129

Washburn, A. M., Sands, L. P., & Walton, P. (2003). Assessment of social cognition in frail seniors and its association with social functioning in the nursing home. The Gerontologist. 43, 203-212.

Wilson, R. S., de Leon, C. F. M., Barnes, L. L., Schneider, J. S., Bienias, J. L., Evans, D. A. & Bennett, D. A. (2002). Participation in cognitively stimulating activities and risk of incident Alzheimer Disease. JAMA, 287,742-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.6.742

World Health Organization. (2003). Directory of Research on Ageing in Africa: 1995-2003. Geneve, Switzerland: Author.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120805.5541

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture