A Study of Opportunities and Threats of Descriptive Assessment from Managers, Teachers and Experts Points of View in Chaharmahal and Bakhteyari Primary Schools

Mahin Naderi, Maryam Shoja Hiedari, Fatemeh Mehrabifar, Hamid Mortazavi, Mohammad Reza Jalilvand

Abstract


The aim of current study is to determine the strength and weakness of executing descriptive evaluation from the viewpoint of deans, teachers and experts of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. A survey descriptive approach was performed. Statistical population includes 208 deans, 303 teachers, and 100 executive experts of descriptive evaluation scheme in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province in educational year 1387-88. Sample’s volume after some statistical estimation calculated to be 175, and members of the sample were selected by random sampling of a category proportional to the selected volume, that contains 100 teachers, 50 deans and 25 experts. To identify the justifiability of the inventory, opinions of twelve persons including advisor professor, consulting professor, designer of the descriptive evaluation scheme, four of educational planning department professors and five of experts holding masters and Ph.D. degrees that are executives of the scheme in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, were used. Measurement tools included: 1) documents including reports, regulations and documents related to the running of this plan; 2) interviews conducted to use the opinions of experts in doing descriptive evaluation; 3) a self-administrated questionnaire including 4 items and 74 close–ended questions, and open – ended ones. For analyzing the data produced by inventory, we used SPSS-13 to analyze the data in two levels of descriptive and inferential. We also have used single variable t-test, independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and least significant difference (LSD) tests. Results showed that the executives of descriptive evaluation scheme in Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province evaluate the so called scheme above average regarding to four scales (strength and weakness).
Key words: Chaharmahal; Bakhteyari; Opportunities; Threats; Primary school

Keywords


Chaharmahal; Bakhteyari; Opportunities; Threats; Primary school

References


AbuMoahammadi, M. & Khanghaee, B. M. (2004). A study of the Viewpoints of Elementary School Teachers Regarding Descriptive Evaluation in Yazd. The Educational Research Council of the Bureau of Education in Yazd (unpublished dissertation).
Arther, L. A. (2004). An Exploration of the Impact of Prior Achievement. Task Complexity, Cultural Knowledge, and Performance Feedback on Mathematics Self-efficacy and Self- Assessment of American Preadolescent Students. Doctoral Dissertation, Howard University.
Berry, R. (2004). Teachers perception of their roles and their students roles in the formative assessment process. Paper presented at the Australian Association for research in Education (AARE2004) Doing the public Good, Melbourne, Austealia. Retrieved at 21 August 2996 from http://www. Aare. Edu. Au/04 pap/ber04978-pdf
Bradby, H., Varyani, M., Oglethorpe, R., Raine, W., White, I. & Helen, M. (2007). British Asian Families and the Use of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: A Qualitative Study of a Hard to Reach Group. Social Science & Medicine, 65(12), 2413-2424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.025
EbrahimiDinani, A. (2007). A study of the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process of Change in the Qualitative-Descriptive Evaluation Plan in Elementary Schools in Isfahan. MA thesis, Isfahan University (unpublished dissertation).
Farstad, H. (2004). Competencies for Life: Some Implication for Education. National Institute Technology, Oslo, Norway, Background paper to workshop, UNESCO, 47 the International Conference on Education, Geneva.
Foster, E. M. (2007). Can System Integration Improve Mental Health Outcomes for Children? Children and Youth Services Review, 29(10), 1301-1319. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.05.004
Fullan, M. & Promfret, A. (1977). Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47 (2), 355-397. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002335
Gest, S. D., Weish, J. & Domitrovich, C. (2005). Behavioral Predictors of Changes in Social Relatedness and Liking School in Elementary School. Journal of School Psychology, 43(4), 281–301. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.06.002
Ghazi, G. (2003). The Relationship Between form of Instruction, Achievement and Perceptions of Classroom Climate. Educational research, 45(1), 83-93. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013188032000086145
Habibi, F. (2008). A Study of the Challenges of Using Descriptive Evaluation. Selected papers of Khoram Abad seminar, bureau of education, Lorestan, KhorramAbad: Shapoorkhast.
Hassani, M. (2006). A Model for Spreading Innovation in the Iranian Educational System. The Educational Innovations Periodical, 15(5). 151-177. Retrieved from http://www.noormags.com/view/fa/articlepage/110135
Hassani, M. (2008). A Guidebook for Performing Qualitative-Descriptive Evaluation in Classrooms. Tehran: Abed Publications.
Hassani, M. & Ahmadi, H. (2005). Descriptive Evaluation: A New Model in Educational Evaluation. Tehran: The Organization of Educational Research and Planning. Ministry of Education.
Hebdige. R. (2003). Teacher Portfolio Assessment. ERIC: ED385608.
Kanter, R.M., Stein B. & Jick T.D. (1992). The Challenge of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience It and Leaders Guide It. New York: Free Press.
Karimi, A. (2005). The Impacts of the New Descriptive Evaluation Method on Behavioral Disorders in Shiraz Elementary School Students. Research report, Fars education organization (unpublished dissertation).
Kemp, J. & Toperoff. D. (1998). Guidelines for Portfolio Assessment in Teaching English. Ministry of Education.
Khoshkholgh, I. & Pasha Sharifi, H. (2006). An Evaluation of the Tentative Performance of Descriptive Evaluation in Some Elementary Schools in the Country. Education periodical, 16(5). 159-173. Retrieved from http://www.noormags.com/view/fa/articlepage/364436
Loukas, A., Murphy, J. (2007). Middle School Student Perceptions of School Climate. Examining Protective Function on Subsequent Adjustment Problems. Journal of school psychology, 45(3), 293-309. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.10.001
Lubbers, M. (2006). The Impact of Peer Relations on Academic Progress in Junior High. Journal of school psychology, 44 (6), 491-512. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.07.005
MehrMohammadi, M. (2002). Curriculum, Attitudes, Viewpoints and Perspectives, Mashhad: Astan Ghods Razavi Publications.
Mohammadi, F. (2005). A Study of the Impacts of Descriptive Evaluation on the Self-esteem of 3rd Grader Elementary Students in Tehran. MA thesis. AL Zahra University (unpublished dissertation).
MortezaeeNezhad, E. (2005). A Study of the Attitudes of Teachers and Parents on Using Descriptive Evaluation in 1st and 2nd Grades of Elementary Schools in Tehran in 2004-5 Academic Year. M.A thesis. Islamic Azad University of ShahreRei (unpublished dissertation).
MoghniZadeh, M.H. (2004). Necessity of Measuring Emotional Intelligence and the Implications of Self-retrieved Educational Improvement. Retrieved from www.parsei.com/education
Manteghi, M. (2006). A Study of the Challenges of Educational Innovations. Tehran: The First Conference of Educational Innovations, 24-38.
Mussavi, S. Z. (2005). An Opinion Poll from Performers of Descriptive Evaluation Based on the Objectives of the Plan in 2004-2005 Academic Years. Research report, Qom Bureau of Education (unpublished dissertation).
Nevo, D. (1995). School-Based Evaluation: A Dialogue School Improvement. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Saeed, M., Gondel. M. B. & Bushra (2005). Assessment Achievement of Primary Grader Students and Factors Affecting Achievement in Pakistan. The International Journal of Education Management, 19, 486-490. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540510617436
Sammons, D. R & Renynolds, S. (1997). School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Retrieved from http/www.aar.edu.au/confo.htm
Seif, A. A. (2003). The Concept of Evaluation and Its Influence on the Teacher’s Methodology and Learning of Students. Tehran: The first conference of educational evaluation, The Bureau of Educational Evaluation.
Shkrollahi, M. (2006). A Comparison of Descriptive and Traditional Evaluation Styles Based on Four Descriptive Standards (Moral, Effectiveness, Practicality and Accuracy), From the Point of View of Tehran Elementary School Teachers in 2004-5 Academic Year. M. A thesis, Tehran, Tarbiat Moalem University.
Sharifi, Hassan pasha (2004). The Evaluation of Performance in the Process of Teaching – Learning. The National Conference of Reforms in Education. 323-341, Tehran: Educational research.
Stiggins, R. (2004). New Assessment Beliefs for a New School Mission. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 22-27. Retrieved from https://docushare.prsd.ab.ca/docushare/dsweb/Get/Version-563/Stiggins%20Paper%20%282%29.pdf
Tawil, S. (2002). Curriculum Change and Social Inclusion. Final report. The Regional Seminar Held in Vilnius, Lithuania. December 2001, UNESCO.
Teresa, W. L. (2004). Formative Assessment in General Studies Classrooms. Hong Kong Teachers Center Journal, 3, 141-154. Retrieved from http://repository.ied.edu.hk/dspace/handle/2260.2/7242
UNESCO (2000). Globalization and Living Together; the Challenge for Educational Content in Asia, Final Report of Sub-regionl Course on Curriculum Development. New Delhi, India.
Van Evera, W. C. (2004). Achievement and Motivation in the Middle School Science Classroom: The Effects of Formative Assessment Feedback. Doctoral Dissertation, George Maason University.
Waddell, C.A. (2004). The Effect of Negotiated Written Feedback Within Formative Assessment on Fourth-grade Students Motivation and Goal Orientations. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Missouri, Saint Louis.
West, R. & Crighton, J. (1999). Examination Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Issues and Trends. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(2), 271-289. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695949992919
Zeinivand, M. (2008). The Influence of the Descriptive Evaluation on Students in Terms of Psychological Well-being. Selected Papers of the Conference 2008, Khoram Abad, Lorestan Bureau of Education, Khoram Aba




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120803.3243

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture