The Comparative Study Between Chinese Agricultural Cooperative and Canadian New Generation Cooperative

Ruxiang LIU

Abstract


Cooperative, as an organization of the weak originated from the need of economic alliance. It is an inevitable result of the development of market economy. But with the increasingly competitive and gradually diverse requirement, there are many organization structures of cooperative in practice. Each has its characteristic, some may stress the help with each other, like traditional cooperative, the others may pay attention to the profit returns, like new generation cooperative. In China, a new legislation related to the cooperative has just implemented for several years, although the management of agriculture cooperatives was unified and the new system supplies played a role gradually, there are still some questions need solve, in which a very important one is whether the legislation has set enough choices for the people who want to adopt the structure of cooperative. According to the current provisions, Chinese cooperative largely can be classified as traditional cooperative which may be suit for most, but in practice, there are more cases about members dominate the cooperative and democracy management mechanisms are often undermined. However, in my opinion, it can be interpreted as the need for the institution innovation from another angle, so it is necessary for legislator to consider system supplying about new forms of cooperative.
Key words: Cooperative; New generation; Institution innovation; China; Canada

Keywords


Cooperative; New generation; Institution innovation; China; Canada

References


Coley, B. G. (2000). Economic Factors Associated with the Growth and Development of Agricultural Cooperatives. San Joaquin Agricultural Law Review, 10(1), 7.
FU Chen (2003). New Generation Cooperatives: Source of Cooperative Institution Innovation. China Rural Economy, 6, 74.
Ferrell, Shannon L. (2002). New Generation Cooperatives and the Capper-Volstead Act: Playing a New Game by the Old Rules. Oklahoma City University Law Review, 27, 737.
ZHANG Yongli, & LIU Jianping (2005). On Relation Between Legislation on Corporative and Rural Society Economic Development in Undeveloped Area. Journal of Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law, 6, 101.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720120803.3024

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)



Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submissionhttp://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture