Comparison of Two Approaches to Methodology of Legal Theory

Chong ZHANG

Abstract


This paper focuses on one of the main arguments in contemporary Anglo-American legal circles: what is the essence of legal theory? This paper is divided into three parts: the first part combs the methodology approach of descriptive method theory, represented by Hart, Raz and, more recently, Julie Dickson, and sums up its three important propositions; the second part summarizes the criticism of the descriptive theory by non-positivism scholars such as Dworkin, Finnis and Stephen Perry; in the third part I put forward my conclusion on the basis of the first two parts: the theory of descriptive law is not a successful legal theory, which should be a theory based on descriptive and normative methodology.


Keywords


Methodology of legal theory; Descriptive; Normative

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chen, J. H. (2006). Principles and sources of Law. Comparative Law Studies, (4).

Chen, J. H. (2014). Why is the Legal theory important-the knowledge Framework of Law and the position of Jurisprudence in it. Law Science, (3).

Finnis. (2003). Natural Law and Natural Rights (J. J. Dong, et al, Trans.). Beijing: China University of political Science and Law Press.

H. L. A. Hart (2011). The concept of law (2nd ed.). J. X. Xu & G. Y. Li (Trans.). Beijing: Law Publishing House.

Austin, J. (2001). The province of jurisprudence determined (X. Liu, Trans.). Beijing: China legal Publishing House.

Finnis, J. (2003). Natural law and natural rights (J. J. Dong, et al., Trans.). Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.

Raz, J. (2005). The authority of law: A collection of law and morality (F. Zhu, Trans.). Beijing: Law Publishing House.

Dickson, J. (2001). Evaluation and legal theory. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Dworkin, R. (1988). Law’s empire. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Shapiro. (2016). Legitimacy (Y. S. Zheng & Y. C. Liu, Trans., p.152). Beijing: China Legal Publishing House.

Shen, Y. H. (2010). Research on methodological issues in New Analytical Jurisprudence. Beijing: Law Publishing House.

Perry, S. (2006). Interpretation and methodology in legal theory. In Andrei Marmor (Ed.), Law and interpretation: A collection of legal philosophy (Z. M. Zhang & Z. L. Xu, Trans., pp. 129-130). Beijing: Law Publishing House.

Perry, S. R. (2001). Hart’s Methodological Positivism. In J. Coleman (Ed.), Hart’s postscript: Essays on the postscript to the concept of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Perry, S. R. (2009). Beyond the distinction between positivism and non-positivism. Ratio Juris, 22(3).

Perry, S. R. (2006). Interpretation and Methodology in legal Theory. In Z. M. Zhang and Z. L. Xu (Trans.), A. Mammer (Ed.), Law and interpretation: A collection of legal philosophy. Beijing: Law Publishing House.

Sun, H. B. (2013, July 28). The turn of methodology in contemporary Anglo-American jurisprudence and its significance. Journal of Shanghai Institute of Political Science and Law, (4).

Wang, L. (2011). A review of several controversies between Hart and Dworkin- From the Perspective of the two Studies. Graduate Jurisprudence (China University of Political Science and Law), (3).

Wang, Z. R. (2013, Dec.). From legal standardization to jurisprudence methodology. Taiwan: Yuanzhao Publishing House.

Yin, D. G. (2016). Arguments and reflections on descriptive methodology. Journal of Suzhou University (Law Edition), (1).

Zhu, Z. (2012). Authority, Common good, and Inherent View-Finnis’s Theory of Authority and its distinction from legal positivism. Law and Social Development, 4.

Zhu, Z. (2016). Descriptive jurisprudence and the construction of law theory. Law Review of Nanjing University, Spring.

Zhuang, S. T. (2007). Is descriptive Legal Theory possible? - A critical reflection. Review of Political and Social Philosophy, June 21.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/11058

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
  • We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture