The Implications of Non-tariff Barriers to Trade on COMESA Free Trade Area: The Case of Zimbabwe and Zambia
Abstract
This research sought to explore the implications of Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) to trade on the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) Free Trade Area (FTA). If the COMESA free trade area is appropriately dealt with, COMESA members and trade stakeholders will get information that is important in their attempt to attain the goal of eliminating trade impediments within the region. This will promote regional economic integration and enhance growth through increased investment levels; scaled up exchange of goods and services; and enhanced socio-economic cooperation. Such cooperation will directly contribute to the improved political and trade relations. The research adopted a case study design in which various cases were examined to understand issues surrounding the implications of NTBs on COMESA free trade area. A qualitative research methodology was also utilised while data was collected through key informant interviews and document analysis. The research concluded that NTBs in COMESA FTA are used on health issues as well as to protect the infant industries in the region. The research therefore recommended that COMESA members find a working definition of what constitute an infant industry for the purpose of applying for derogation; and also that they make use of bilateral trade agreements to eliminate existing NTBs where States clearly indicated their objectives of removing all NTBs that inhibit trade between them.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Charalambides, N. (2013). What Shoprite and Woolworths can tell us about Non-tariff barriers. African Perspective, Global Insights. SAIIA Occasional paper No 148, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
COMESA Protocol on the Rules of Origin. (2015). COMESA http://www.comesa.int.
COMESA Treaty (1993). COMESA http://www.comesa.int
COMESA. (2014). COMESA Regulations on Non-Tariff Barriers (Adopted under paragraph 217 of the Report of the Thirty-Third Meeting of the Council of Ministers), 08 – 09 December 2014. Lusaka, Zambia.
Crane, T., & Amawi, A. (1997). The Theoretical evolution of international political economy: A reader. New York: Oxford University Press.
Deardorff, V. (1987). Why do Governments prefer Nontariff barriers? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 26 pp 191-216, North-Holland.
Giermanski, J. (1994). Standards as Non-Tariff Barriers: Nafta's Impact. www.texascenter.tamiu.edu
Gillson, I., & Charalambides, N. (2011). Addressing non-tariff barriers on regional trade in southern Africa. Gaborone, Sustainable Commerce Consulting.
Gillson, l. (2010). Regional integration to eliminate the fragmented goods market in Southern Africa, Africa Trade Policy Notes.
Gurler, O. (2002). WTO agreements on non-tariff barriers to trade & implications for OIC MEMBER States. Journal of Economic Cooperation, 23, 62-63.
Hangi, M. (2010). The non-tariff barriers in trading within the EAC. Research Paper, CUTS Geneva Resource Centre.
Imani Development. (2007). Inventory of Regional Non-Tariff Barriers: Synthesis Report.www.imanidevelopment.com
Karingi, S. (2015). Implications of the COMESA free trade area and the proposed customs union: An empirical investigation.www.researchgate.net
Karugia, J. (2009). The impact of non-tariff barriers on maize and beef trade in East Africa, RESAKSS Working Paper No. 29.
Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (2001). Power and interdependence (3rd ed). Princeton. Longman
Khandelwal, P. (2004). COMESA and SADC: Prospects and challenges for regional trade integration. IMF WP/04/227.
Mold, A. (2005). Non-tariff barriers: Their prevalence and relevance for African countries. ATPC Work in Progress No.25. African Trade Policy Centre, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. www.uneca.org
The Zimbabwe Herald Newspaper. (2016). New import regulations gazetted. www.herald.co.zw
The Zimbabwe Standard Newspaper. (2011). Minister Slams border post delays. http://www.thestandard.co.zw
UNCTAD. (2013). Non-tariff measures to trade: Economic and policy issues for developing countries. New York and Geneva.
Van Den Bossche, P. (2006). The law and policy of the world trade organization: Text, cases and materials, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Viljoen, W. (2011). Non-tariff barriers affecting trade in COMESA-EAC-SADC tripartite free trade agreement. www.tralac.org
World Bank. (2010). Doing business 2010: Reforming through difficult times. www.doingbusiness.org
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10886
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture