Canadian Social Science
Variations on a Theme: Corruption in Mexico and the U.S.
Abstract
While widely-cited measures based on expert opinion show significantly higher levels of corruption in Mexico than the U.S., other surveys reflecting public opinion show strikingly much closer results. Such patterns raise questions regarding the underlying meanings and types of corruption that inform these surveys. This paper explores these differences and similarities while highlighting the distinct patterns of corruption found in the two countries. I argue that the opinions of the Mexican and US public emphasize a certain form of corruption and share a broader understanding of the concept, while experts’ opinion reflect a narrower approach and understanding of corruption. In the end, the study underscores the serious mismatch between different conceptualizations and types of corruption, on the one hand, and how corruption is measured, on the other.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Atkinson, M. M., & Bierling, G. (2005). Politicians, the public and political ethics: Worlds apart. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 38(4), 1018–1021.
Bedirhanoglu, P. (2007). The neoliberal discourse on corruption as a means of consent building: reflections from post-crisis turkey. Third World Quarterly, 28 (7), 1239-1254.
Brennan Center for Justice. (n.d.). National survey: Super PACs, corruption, and democracy: Americans’ attitudes about the influence of super PAC spending on government and the Implications for our democracy. New York University School of Law.
Brown, Ed., & Cloke, J. (2004). Neoliberal reform, governance and corruption in the south: assessing the international anti-corruption crusade. Antipode, 36(2), 272-294.
Brown, Ed., & Cloke, J. (2011). Critical perspective on corruption: An overview. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(2), 116-124.
Bukovansky, M. (2006). The Hollowness of anti-corruption discourse. Review of International Political Economy, 13(2), 181-209.
Carnoy, M. (1984). The state and political theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Curry, B. (2016). ‘It’s the corruption, stupid:’ Hillary’s too compromised to see what Donald Trump understands. www.salon.com/2016/02/03/its_the_corruption_..
Damarys, C., & Allison, E. M. (2005). Perceptions of political corruption in Latin American democracies. Latin American Politics & Society, 47(3), 91-111.
De Maria, B. (2008). Neo-colonialism through measurement: A critique of the corruption perception index. Critical Perspectives in International Business, 4(23), 184-202.
Dickerson, A. (2013). McCutcheon v. FEC and the supreme court’s return to Buckley. Cato Supreme Court Review (January), 95-130.
Dieter, H., & Shore, C., (Eds.). (2005). Corruption: Anthropological perspectives. London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
Dimant, E. (2013). The nature of corruption: An interdisciplinary perspective. Economics Discussion Paper No. 2013-59. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2013-59.
Dobel, J. P. (1978). The corruption of a state. American Political Science Review, 72, 958-973.
Encuesta Nacional de la Cultura Política (ENCUP). (2012). Mexico City: Secretaría de Gobernación.
Etzioni, A. (2014). Political corruption in the United States: A design draft. PS (January), 141-144.
Frankovic, K. (2016). Democrats and republicans: Both agree party nomination rules need to change. http://today.yougov.com/news/2016/04/29/democrats-and-republicans
Galtung, F. (2005). Measuring the immeasurable: Boundaries and functions of (Macro) corruption indices, In A. Shacklock, F. Galtung, & C. Sampford (Eds), Measuring Corruption (101-130). U.K.: Ashgate.
Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence & influence: Economic inequality and political power in America. Princeton, NJ and New York: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
Gilens, M., & Benjamin, I. P. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564-581.
Grant. W. (2015). Defining corruption where the state is weak: The case of Papua new guinea. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(1), 15-31.
Hall, D. (1999). Privatisation, multinationals, and corruption. Development in Practice, 9(5), 539-556.
Hart Research Associates. (2010). Protecting Democracy from Unlimited Corporate Spending. June 6-7. http://files.pfaw.org/pfaw_files/CitUPoll-PFAW.pdf
Heidenheimer, A.J. (Ed). (1970). Political corruption: Readings in comparative analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Heywood, P. M. (Ed). (2015). Introduction: Scale and focus in the study of corruption, Routledge handbook of political corruption. London: Routledge.
Heywood, P. M., & Jonathan, R. (2014). ‘Close but no cigar’: The measurement of corruption. Journal of Public Policy, 34(3), 507-529.
Jackson, M., & Smith, R. (1996). Inside moves and outside views: An Australian case study of elite and public perceptions of political corruption. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 9(1), 23-41.
Johnston, M. (2012). Corruption control in the U.S. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(2), 329-345.
Johnston, M. (2014). Corruption, contention and reform: The power of deep democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Johnston, M. (1996). The search for definitions: The vitality of politics and the issue of corruption. International Social Science Journal, 149, 321-336.
Johnston, M. (2004). Keeping the answers, changing the questions: Corruption definitions revisited. (unpublished in English).
Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of corruption: Wealth, power and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jon, C. (2014). Americans less satisfied with freedoms. Gallup. http://gallup.com/poll/172019/americas-less-satisfied-freedom.aspx.
Kaufmann, D. E., & Pedro C. Vicente. (2011). Legal corruption. Economics and Politics, 23(2), 195-219.
Kurer, O. (2005). Corruption: An alternative approach to its definition and measurement. Political Studies, 53, 222-239.
Lessig, L. (2011). Republic lost: How money corrupts congress – and a plan to stop it. New York: Twelve.
Lessig, L. (2013, March 15). Institutional corruption (Edmond J. Safra Working Papers, No. 1). Harvard University, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics.
Luis, R. J., Brown, Ed., & Cloke, J. (2011). Of legitimate and illegitimate corruption: bankruptcies in Nicaragua. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(2), 159-176.
Manuel, V., Jiminez, F., & Revuelta, A. (2014). Corruption perception and collective action: The case of Spain. In Mendilow & Peleg (Eds.). Corruption in the Contemporary World (197-222).
Mauro, P. (1997). The effects of corruption on growth, investment and government expenditure: A cross-country analysis. In Kimberly A. E. (Ed.). Corruption and the Global Economy (pp.83-107). Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
McAllister, I. (2000). Keeping them honest: Public and elite perceptions of ethical conduct among Australian legislators. Political Studies, 48(1), 22-37.
Mendilow, J. (2016). Introduction -- corruption and governmental legitimacy: A twenty-first century perspective, In Mendilow & P. Ilan (Eds.). Corruption and Governmental Legitimacy: A Twenty-First Century Perspective (pp.1-20). London: Lexington Books.
Mendilow, J., & Ilan, P. (Eds.). (2014). Corruption in the contemporary world: Theory, practice, and hotspots. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
Mocan, N. (2004). What determines corruption? International evidence from micro data. (Working Paper 10460). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Morris, S. D. (2008). Disaggregating corruption: A comparison of participation and perceptions in Latin America with special focus on Mexico. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 27 (3), 388-409.
Morris, S. D., & Joseph, L. K. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Politics Studies, 43(10), 1258-1285.
Muir, S., & Akhil, G. (2018). Rethinking the anthropology of corruption: An introduction to supplement 18. Current Anthropology, 59 (Supplement 18), S4-S15.
Nicholas, A., & Birch, S. (2012). On either side of a moat? Elite and mass attitudes towards right and wrong. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 89-116.
Nichols, J., & Robert, W. M. (2013). Dollarocracy: How the money-and-media election complex is destroying America. New York: Nation Books.
Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American Political Science Review, 61, 417-27.
Oguzhan, D., & Johnston. M. (2014, December 1). Measuring illegal and legal corruption in American states: Some results from the corruption in America survey. Harvard University, Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics.
Olkem, B. A. (2006). Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality (Working Paper 12428). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Pellegata, A., & Vincenzo, M. (2012). Can corruption erode the confidence in political institutions among European countries? Comparing the effects of different measures of perceived corruption. Paper presented at XXII World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Madrid, July 8-12.
Pew Research Center. (2014b). Public trust in government: 1958-2014. November 13. Http://www.people-press.org/2014/11/13/public-trust-in-government/
Pew Research Center. (2014a). Beyond red vs. blue: The political typology. June. http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/6-26-14-Political-Typology-release1.pdf
Philp, M. (1997). Defining political corruption. Political Studies XLV, 436-462.
Philp, M. (2015). The definition of political corruption, In P. M. Heywood (Ed). Routledge Handbook on Political Corruption (pp.17-29). London: Routledge.
Razafindrakoto, M., & Francois, R. (2010). Are international databases on corruption reliable? A Comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 38(8), 1057-1069.
Redlawsk, D. P., & James, A. M. (2005). Popular interpretations of ‘corruption’ and their partisan consequences. Political Behavior, 27(3), 261-283.
Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Rusciano, F. L. (2014). The meaning of corruption in world opinion, In Mendilow & Peleg (Eds.). Corruption in the contemporary world: Theory, practice, and hotspots (pp.27-45).
Sandoval, B., & Irma, E. (2013). From ‘institutional’ to ‘structural’ corruption: Rethinking accountability in a world of public-private partnerships (Edmond J. Safra Working Papers, No. 33). Harvard University.
Selds, B. (2014). The shifting landscape of corruption in the United States: Legal corruption, systemic corruption, or a new norm? In Mendilow & Peleg (Eds.), Corruption in the Contemporary World (47-68).
Shaun, B., & Donovan, T. (2016). Campaign money, congress, and perceptions of corruption. American Politics Research, 44(2), 272-295.
Smith, M. L. (2008). Explaining corruption perceptions: A cross-national analysis of 15 countries. Presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Soreide, T. (2006). Is it wrong to rank? A critical assessment of corruption indices. Chr. Michelsen Institute: 1-13.
Staffan, A., & Heywood. M. P. (2009). The politics of perception: Use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Political Studies, 57, 746-767.
Stanfill, B. A., Amanda, D., Villareal, M. R., Medina, E. P., Esquievel, Erika de la Rosa., & Phyllis, A. D. (2016). Beyond the culture of corruption: Staying ethical while doing business in Latin America. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict (January).
Thompson, D. F. (2013). Two concepts of corruption. Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, (Working Papers), No. 16, August 1, Harvard University,.
Torsello, D., & Bertrand, V. (2016). The anthropology of corruption. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 34-54.
Transparencia Mexicana. (2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2010). Encuesta Nacional de Corrupción y Buen Gobierno. Mexico City, Mexico. http://www.tm.org.mx/
Treisman, D. (2007). What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 211-44.
Warren, M. E. (2004). What does corruption mean in a democracy? American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 328-343.
Warren, M. E. (2006). Political corruption as duplicitous exclusion. PS: Political Science and Politics, 39(4), 803-807.
World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report. (2017-18). https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018
World Justice Rule of Law Index. (n.d.). https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/wjp-rule-law-index/wjp-rule-law-index-2017%E2%80%932018
World Values Survey. (2010). Wave 6. Data available at http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp.
Wroe, A., Nicholas A., & Birch, S. (2015). The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption. European Political Science Review (electronic).
You, J-S., & Sanjeev, K. (2005). A comparative study of inequality and corruption. American Sociological Review, 70, 136-157.
Zhu, J. N., Jie, L., & Shil, T. J. (2012). When grapevine news meets mass media: Different information sources and popular perceptions of government corruption in mainland China. Comparative Political Studies. Online version published 5 November.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10553
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
