Stance in News Discourse: Analysis of Two News Reports in Daily Newspapers in China and the US

Xiaowan YANG

Abstract


The recent Sino-US trade disputes add to the long list of economic and political conflicts between the two largest economies in the world. However, although a trade war is now put on hold with the two countries continuing their negotiations, a different war is fought by major news and business press in both countries to justify the actions taken by each side and gain support from the international community. It therefore becomes a topic of interest as to how the news media make deliberate language choices to influence their readers with their stances and attitudes. This study compares two news reports in daily newspapers in China and the US on a significant trade dispute between China and the US: US imposing safeguard duties on tires from China in 2009. Through Transitivity and Modality analysis, this study aims to demonstrate how news media from rival countries make language choices to help reconstruct events and how different stances and attitudes are implied so as to manipulate the readers to interpret information in an intended way.


Keywords


Stance; News reports; Transitivity; Modality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, E. L. (2009). U.S. adds tariffs on Chinese tires. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.NYTimes.com/2009/09/12/business/global/12tires.html?_r=0

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide (2nd ed.). Sydney NSW: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse – textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.

Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

Hufbauer, G. C., & Woollacott, J. C. (2010). Trade disputes between China and the United States: Growing pains so far, worse ahead? Retrieved from https://file:///D:/00/wp10-17.pdf

Li, J. (2009). Intertextuality and national identity: Discourse of national conflicts in daily newspapers in the United States and China. Discourse & Society, 20(1), 85-121. doi: 10.1177/0957926508097096

Statista (n.d.). Volume of U.S. exports of trade goods to China from 1985 to 2017 (in billion U.S. dollars). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/186510/volume-of-us-exports-of-trade-goods-to-china-since-1985/

Statista (n.d.). Volume of U.S. imports of trade goods from China from 1985 to 2017 (in billion U.S. dollars). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/187675/volume-of-us-imports-of-trade-goods-from-china-since-1985/

Teo, P. (2000). Racism in the news: A critical discourse analysis of news reporting in two Australian newspapers. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 7-48.

Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

Verscheuren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. London: Arnold.

Xinhua. (2009). US tire duties “serious trade protectionism”. China Daily. Retrieved from https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-09/12/content_8685775.htm




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10369

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Canadian Social Science

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

Submission Guidelines for Canadian Social Science

We are currently accepting submissions via email only. The registration and online submission functions have been disabled.

Please send your manuscripts to css@cscanada.net，or css@cscanada.org for consideration. We look forward to receiving your work.

 Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

 

Canadian Social Science Editorial Office

Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138 
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org 
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net

Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture