Canadian Social Science
Issues, Trends and Challenges in an Emerging Global Power Structure
Abstract
The reality of the early 21st century is that the world is in the grip of the transformation of the power structure. China has risen into global reckoning; Russia began to rise from its inertia; North Korea has evolved to a global threat. All have begun to lay claims to a greater role in the international political system. The unipolarism of the post-Soviet era seems to be dissolving before our eyes. These emerging trends raise questions as to; what sort of multipolarism are we talking about? How will the coming multipolar order operate? Will great power be able to work together to uphold order? Will they descend into self centred and destabilizing military and economic competitions? Can the world support multiple world orders, co-existent yet separate? There are no iron-clad answers to these questions. However, current geopolitics does, perhaps, allow for a glimpse into the future.
This article aims to contribute to that discourse by making three claims. First, there is a dramatic increase in the number of global actors. Second, the diversity among actors has created opportunities for the emergence of new systems and new partnerships and for old ones to be strengthened and transformed. Lastly, the future multi-polar world will be potentially more unstable than all the other multi-polar periods history has experienced: for the first time in history, the world could become both multi-polar and nuclear.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anonymous. (2017, September 18). The risk of nuclear war with North Korea on the ground in Pyongyang: Could Kim Jong- Un and Donald Trump goad each other into a devastating confrontation? The New Yorker. Retrieved 2017, November 12 from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/09/18/the-risk-of-nuclear-war-with-north-korea
Beeson, M., & N. Bisley. (Eds.). (2010). Issues in 21st century world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Breuer, W. B. (1999). Undercover tales of World War II. New York: J. Wiley.
Broad, W. J. (2016). North Korea will have the skills to make a nuclear warhead by 2020, experts say. The New York Times. Retrievced 21017, November 23 from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/10/science/north-korea-nuclear-weapons.html?_r=0
Brow, D. (2017). Most of the world has seen an increase in terrorism—But deaths from terror attacks have decreased. PULSE. Retrieved 2017, November 23 from http://www.pulse.ng/bi/politics/politics-most-of-the-world-has-seen-an-increase-in-terrorism-but-deaths-from-terror-attacks-have-decreased-id7604646.html
Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The grand chessboard: America Primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. New York: Basic Books.
Carr, E. H. (1964). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939. New York: Harper & Row.
Checkel, J. (1997). Ideas and international political change: Soviet/Russian behavior and the end of the cold war. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Christensen, T. J., & Snyder, J. (1990). Chain Gangs and Passed Bucks: Predicting alliance patterns in multipolarity. International Organization, 44(2).
Confino, J. (2017). The (new) new world order. Republic Paper. Retrieved 2017, November 16 from http://republicpaper.com/2017/03/27/the-new-new-world-order/
Connelly, E. A. J. (2017, October 28). Threat of nuclear attack by North Korea ‘accelerating: Mattis. New York Post. Retrieved 2017, November 12 from http://nypost.com/2017/10/28/threat-of-nuclear-attack-by-north-korea-accelerating-mattis/
Craig, G. A., & George, A. (1983). Force and statecraft-diplomatic problems of our time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dellios, R. (2004-2005). The rise of China as a global power. The Culture Mandala, 6(2).
Einhorn, C., Fairfield, H., & Wallace. T. (2015). Russia rearms for a new era. Retrieved 2017, November 23 from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/12/24/world/asia/russia-arming.html
Friedberg, A. (2011). A contest for supremacy: China, America and the struggle for the mastery of Asia. New York: W.W.Norton.
Friedman, G. (2013). Beyond the post-cold war world. Retrieved 2017, November 12 from http://worldview.stratfor.com/weekly/beyond-post-cold-war-world
Frolic, B. M. (1997). Re-engaging China: Striking a balance between trade and human rights. Canada Among Nations 1997, Asia Pacific Face-off, Carleton Public Policy Series # 21, (Ottawa: Carleton University Press Inc).
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest (16), 3-18.
Haass, R. (2015 March 25). The middle east takes another turn for the worse. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/content/699cbc8c-0cc4-368f-b90e-cd2e9a1575b4
Halper, S. (2010). The beijing consensus: How China’s authoritarian model will dominate the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Held, D. (2017). Broken politics: From 9/11 to the present. Retrieved 2017, October 12 from http://www.opendemocracy.net/david-held/broken-politics-from-911-to-present
Held, D. (2016). Global politics after 9/11: Failed wars, political fragmentation and the rise of authoritarianism. London: Global Policy.
Heywood, A. (2011). Global politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hitler, A. (2009). Mein Kampf official Nazi English translation. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Hughes, B. B. (n.d.). Continuity and change in world politics: Competing perspectives. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Huntington, S. P. (1999). The lonely superpower. Foreign Affairs, 78(2).
Hutton, W. (2007). The writing on the wall: China and the west in the 21st century. London: Little, Brown.
Ikenberry, G. (Ed.). (2002). America unrivalled: The future of the balance of power. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Jacques, M. (2012). When China rules the world: The rise of the Middle Kingdom and the end of the Western World. London: Penguin.
Jervis, R. (2009). Unipolarity: A structural perspective. World Politics, 6(1).
Kaarbo, J., & James, L. R. (2011). Global politics. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Kanet, R. E. (Ed.). (2007). Russia: Re-emerging great power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kapstein, E., & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.). (1999). Unipolar politics: Realism and state strategies after the cold war. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kegley, C. W., & Wittkopf, E. R. (2005). World politics: Trends and transformation. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co Inc.
Kupchan, C. (1998). After pax Americana: Benign power, regional integration, and the sources of a stable multipolarity. International Security, 23(2).
Lane, J., & Maeland, R. (2008). International organisation as coordination in N person games. Political Studies, 54 (1).
Legvold, R. (2016). Return to cold war. Malden: Polity Press.
Lo, B. (2015). Russia and the new world disorder. London, UK: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Macfarlane, S. N. (2006). The “R” in BRICs: Is Russia an emerging power? International Affairs, 82(1).
Mastanduno, M. (1997). Preserving the unipolar moment. Realist theories and US grand strategy after the cold war. International Security, 21(4).
Mearsheimer, J. (1990). Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the cold war. International Security, 15(1).
Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: Norton.
Monteiro, N. (2011). Polarity and power: U.S. hegemony and China’s challenge. International Security, 36(3).
Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace (4th ed). New York: Alfred Knopf.
Reif, K. (2017). Missile defense can’t save us from North Korea.Retrieved 2017, November 12 from http://warontherocks.com/2017/05/missile-defense-cant-save-us-from-north-korea/
Schroeder, P. (1994). The transformation of European politics 1763-1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sytoll, R. J. (1989). State power, world views and the major powers. In R. Stoll & M. D. Ward (Eds.), Power in world politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Toma P. A., & Gorman R. F. (1991). International relations: Understanding global issues. California: Wadsworth Inc.,
Trenin, D. (2016). Should we fear Russia? Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Van Creveld, M. (1991). The transformation of war (British edition: The future of war) (p.197). New York: Free Press.
Waltz, K. (1964). The stability of a bipolar world. Daedalus, 93(3).
Waltz, K. (2000). Structural realism after the cold war. International Security, 25(1).
White, D. W. (1999). The American century: The rise and decline of the United States as a world power new haven. Yale University Press.
Więcławski, J. (2008). Russia—Reemerging as a global power? Globality Studies Journal, 11.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/10182
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 Canadian Social Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/css/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Canadian Social Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
Canadian Social Science Editorial Office
Address: 1020 Bouvier Street, Suite 400, Quebec City, Quebec, G2K 0K9, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
