Functions of Fate Schema: The Case of Persian and English
Abstract
Key words: Schema; Cultural Schema; Ghesmat; Fate; Cultural Keywords; Intercultural Communication
Resumé: Dans le but de contribuer à la connaissance actuelle des communications interculturelles, cette étude explore les schémas culturels de ghesmat et le destin dans les sociétés persane et anglaise. En particulier, il essaie de montrer à quel point ces deux schémas culturels sont comparables à travers les locuteurs de ces deux communautés linguistiques. Les données ont été recueillies par une triangulation, c'est-à-dire à travers des observations ethnographiques, des films et des sites web. Les données recueillies ont été analysées qualitativement et quantitativement. Pour effectuer une analyse quantitative, la fréquence du schéma du destin et de ghesmat dans de différentes situations en anglais et en persan a été calculée. D'ailleurs, afin de trouver des thèmes sous-jacents de l'activation des schémas, une analyse qualitative de contenu et l'analyse sémantique de Wierzbicka ont été employées. Les résultats améliorent davantage les connaissances culturelles impliquées dans les communications interculturelles et discutent des rôles socioculturels de ghesmat et des schémas de destin culturels dans les communautés de la parole.
Mots-clés: Schéma; Schéma Culturel; Ghesmat; Destin; Mots-Clés Culturels; Communication Interculturelle
Keywords
References
Azadarmaki, T. (1997). Eximing renovation hypothesis: A case study of cultural fatalism in Iran. Culture, 22, 191- 208.
Colby, B. N. (1975 ). Culture grammars. Science 187, 913-919.
Conklin, H. C. (1962). Lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. In F. W. Householder & S. Saporta (Eds.), In problems in lexicography (pp. 119-141). Bloomington: Indiana Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore and Linguistics.
Fardia, N. (2006). Fatalism in Hafez Poems. Reflection of Thought, 78, 753-758.
Frake, C. O. (1962 ). The ethnographic study of cognitive systems. In D. C. Anthropological Society of Washington (Washington (Ed.), Anthropology and human behavior (pp. 72-85). Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington.
Heidarpour, A. (2007). Manifestation of destiny in the lives of some shahnameh’s heroes. Human Sciences 54, 237-252.
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Huberman, M. A., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Johnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.
Karami, M. (2003). Fate and destiny in literature and their effect on Iranian culture. Journal of the college of literature and social science, 168, 129-115-.
Kolbe, R. H., & Burnett, M. S. (1991). Content analysis research: an examination of applications for improving research reliability. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 243–264.
Kracauer, S. (1952). The challenge of qualitative content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 631–642.
Labov, W. (1970). The study of Language in its social context. Stadium Generale, 23, 30-87.
Locke, J. (1959). An essay concerning human understanding. NY: Dover.
Merriam-Webster, I. (2003). Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary: Merriam-Webster, Inc.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960 ). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Nolan, P. (Ed.) (1967) New Catholic encyclopedia (Vols. 6).
Ringgren, H. (1952). Fatalism in Persian epics: Lundequistska bokhandeln.
Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce & W. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
Rumelhart, D., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in parallel distributed processing. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 7–57). Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
Schilling, J. (2006). On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 28–37.
Smith, C. (Ed.) (1903) Synonyms discriminated: a dictionary of synonymous words in the English language. Detroit: Gale Research Co.
Solomon, R. C. (2003). On fate and fatalism. Philosophy East and West, 53(4), 435-454.
Spradley, J. P. (1972 ). Foundations of cultural knowledge. In J. P. Spradley (Ed.), Culture and Cognition (pp. 3-38). San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co.
Summers, D. (2005). Longman dictionary of contemporary English: Pearson Education.
Taghi, S. (2009). Fate definitions in iranian spoken and writen culture. Sweden: Baran Press.
Wallace, A. F. C. (1965 ). Driving to work. In M. E. Spiro (Ed.), Context and meaning in cultural anthropology (pp. 277-292). New York: The Free Press.
Werner, O. (1970 ). Cultural knowledge, language, and world view. In P. Garvin (Ed.), In Cognition: A Multiple View (pp. 155-176). New York: Spartan Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-cultural Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, culture, and congnition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (2010). Cross-cultural communication and miscommunication: The role of cultural keywords. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(1), 1–23.
Wierzbicka, A., & Goddard, C. (2004). Cultural scripts. Special issue of Intercultural Pragmatics, 1(2), 153–166.
Wolcott, H. F. (1992). Posturing in qualitative inquiry. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 3-52). New York: Academic Press.
Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: sociolinguistics and TESOL. Cambridge and New York: Newbury House.
Wolfson, N., & Manes, J. (1980). The compliment as a social strategy. Linguistics, 13(3), 391-410.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110702.016
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2011 Salva Shirinbakhsh, Abbass Eslamirasekh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture