The Taming of the Electronic Shrew: Localizing the Global Spread of Television
Abstract
A common assumption maintains that the global outreach of mass media inevitably leads to deleterious consequences for native communities. Indeed, different scholars have argued that awareness of the outside world from television results in the homogenization of local cultures. However, images viewed through the electronic peephole radically transform not only an understanding of the outside world, but the way indigenes define themselves and their relationship to each other. By presenting subaltern audiences with an idealized other, television compels the emergence of an objectified self. “Who are ‘we’?” would not have been asked—or asked in the same way—were it not for the “Who are ‘they’?” necessitated by the introduction of television. Paradoxically, contrary to most fears, television actually helps to create rather than destroy a cultural identity by forcing subaltern viewers to re-define themselves in a dialogical relationship to the dominant society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas. London: Methuen.
Ang, I. (1996). Living room wars: Rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world. London: Routledge.
Appadurai, A. (1991). Global ethnoscapes: Notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. In R. Fox (ed.), Recapturing Anthropology (pp.191-210). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
Bagdikian, B. H. (2000). The media monopoly. Boston: Beacon.
Barber, B. (1995). Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Times Books.
Barboza, D. (2001, October 14 ). When golden arches are too red, white, and blue. New York Times, p.C1, C26.
Bigsby, C. (1975). Superculture: American popular culture and Europe. Bowling Green: Bowling Green University Press.
Bloom, A. (2001, May 13). Seeing television with innocent, and eager, eyes. New York Times, p.C21.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). An outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television. New York: The New York Press.
Bowden, M. (2001, September 13). Support of Israel, wealth made U.S. target. Albuquerque Journal, p.A5.
Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2003). Media society: Industries, images, and audiences. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Demick, B. (2003, July 12 ). U.S. gets a bad name in South Korean schools. Los Angeles Times, p.A3.
Efron, S. (2004 March 17). U.S. seen unfavorably, poll shows. Los Angeles Times, p.A16.
Elboghdady, D. (2002, December 18). McDonald’s faces first loss. Albuquerque Journal, p.B4.
Eller, C., & Munoz, L. (2002, October 6). The plots thicken in foreign markets. Los Angeles Times, p.A1, A26, A27.
Farrell, G. (1998, October 29). Mastercard joins the growing card that believes what sells here will sell there, too. New York Times, p.C7.
Foster, R.J. (2002) Materializing the nation: Commodities, consumption, and media in Papua New Guinea. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fraser, S. (2000, November 5). Female suicides rise in Turkey. Albuquerque Journal, p.A12.
Gillespie, N. (2003, June 1). Big media’s value to consumers. Los Angeles Times, p.M5.
Gitlin, T. (2000). Inside prime time. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goodman, E. (1999, May 27). Exporting our TV culture and insecurities on weight. Philadelphia Inquirer, p.A43.
Greenberg, J. (1998, December 20). Israel battles new foreign foe: Music. New York Times, p.A10.
Greider, W. (1999). One world of consumers. In R. Rosenblatt (Ed.), Consuming desires: Consumption, culture, and the pursuit of happiness (pp. 23-36). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Hannerz, U. (1987). The world in creolization. Africa, 57(4), 546-559.
Hannerz, U. (1992). The global ecumene. In U. Hannerz (Ed.), Cultural complexity: Studies in the sociological organization of meaning (pp.217-267). New York: Columbia University Press.
Haskell, M. (1999). Movies and the selling of desire. In R. Rosenblatt (Ed.), Consuming desires (pp.123-136). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Hofmeister, S. (2003 June 3). Is free TV worth saving in a 500-channel world? Los Angles Times, p.A1, A22.
Jhala, J. (1998). The shaping of Gujarati Cinema: Recognizing the new in traditional cultures. Visual Anthropology, 11, 373-385.
Katz, E. (1977). Can authentic cultures survive new media? Journal of Communication, 113-121.
Kay, J. (2002 December 8). Snacks have cultural spice. Albuquerque Journal, p.C4.
Kottak, C. P. (1990). Prime-time society: An anthropological analysis of television and culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Levitt, T. (1988). The pluralization of consumption. Harvard Business Review, 7-8.
Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1990). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of Dallas. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lowry, B. (2003, June 3) . Revised regulations already the status quo. Los Angeles Times, p.C1, C6.
Maykuth, A. (1998, July 4). It’s a south African spin on main street America. Philadelphia Inquirer, p.A1, A14.
Menzel, P. (1993). Material world: A global family Portrait. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
Michaels, E. (1987). Hollywood iconography: A Warlpiri reading. In P. Drummond & R. Patterson (Eds.), Television and its audience: International research perspectives (pp.109-124). London: British Film Institute.
Morley, D. (1991). Where the global meets the local: Notes from the sitting room. Screen, 32(1), 1-17.
Philo, S. (1998). Getting dumber and dumber: MTV’s global footprint. Cultural Studies Study Group, 16.
Ritzer, G. (2000). The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
Rothstein, E. (2001, June 2). Why American pop culture spreads. New York Times, p.B11.
Rubin, T. (1991, July 4). Global village is still far away. Philadelphia Inquirer, p.A21.
Scott, A. O. (2000, January 30). The whole world isn’t watching. New York Times, p.F11.
Simmons, A. M. (2000, August 15). Quest for light skin is darkening lives in Africa. Los Angeles Times, p.A10.
Simon, R. (2003, June 3). New FCC guidelines create stir in congress. Los Angeles Times, p.C1, C6.
Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural imperialism: A critical introduction. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Watson, J. (1997). Golden arches east. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Watson, J. (2002, December 14). Tamales help Oaxaca win food fight with McDonald’s. Albuquerque Journal, p.C1.
Wise, M. Z. (2003, July 5). America starkly drawn by others. Los Angeles Times, p.E1, E9.
Wright, K. (1990). The road to the global village. Scientific American, 84-94.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9406
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 Sam Pack
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture