Cross-Cultural Communication
The Syntax of Backgrounding Controversial Issues in Media Discourse: A Critical Analysis of New York Times COVID-19 Reports About China
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the use of relative clauses in New York Times COVID-19 reports on China, aiming to reveal the manipulative strategies employed in media discourse in establishing a link between persuasive argumentation and the discourse functions of relative clauses. The study finds that through syntactically backgrounding potentially controversial issues in relative clauses regarding China’s Covid containment, reporters reduce the readers to accept the tacit truth of the presupposed propositions, thus enhancing the acceptance and manipulation of their political argumentation. The study further shows that relative clauses, by virtue of providing causal-explanatory links, facilitate a biased interpretation to occupy readers’ political cognitive space. The study further suggests a modification of the function taxonomy of relevance relative clauses on the basis of Loock (2007). Offering evidence from mass communication, our critical analysis is expected to shed new light on the link between syntax and manipulation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bekalu, M. A. (2006). Presupposition in news discourse. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 147-172.
Bonyadi, A. (2011). Linguistic nature of presupposition in American and Persian newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1-16.
Calsamiglia, H., & Ferrero, C. L. (2003). Role and position of scientific voices: Reported speech in the media. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 147-173.
Cornish, F. (2018). Revisiting the system of English relative clauses: Structure, semantics, and discourse functionality. English Language and Linguistics, 22(3), 431-456.
Entman, R. M. (2007). Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 57(1): 163-173.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingham, R. (2019). The syntax of foregrounding and backgrounding in English civil war political discourse: A text analysis. In Sprachgebrauch in der Politik (pp.129-144). De Gruyter.
Kameswari, L., Sravani, D., & Mamidi, R. (2020). Enhancing Bias Detection in Political News Using Pragmatic Presupposition. Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media: 1-6.
Kuypers, J. A. (2002). Press bias and politics: How the media frame controversial issues. New York: Praeger.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, C. (2020). Suffering of others-A case study of Wall Street Journal on how media represents China in Covid-19. International Communications, (5), 69-72.
Loock, R. (2007). Appositive relative clauses and their functions in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(2), 336–362.
Mao, W. (2020). Discourse Construction and Framing Analysis of Covid-19 Reports in Overseas Media. Chinese Journalist, (4): 82-86.
Masia, V. (2020). Presupposition, assertion and the encoding of evidentiality in political discourse. Linguistik online, 102(2):129-153.
Papi, M. B. (2009). Implicitness. In J. Verschueren & J.Östman (Eds.), Key Notions for Pragmatics (pp.139-162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Peng, Z. (2004). Representation of China: An across time analysis of coverage in the New York Times and Los Angeles Times. Asian Journal of Communication, 14(1): 53-67.
Sbisà, M. (1999). Ideology and the persuasive use of presupposition. In J. Verschueren (Ed.) Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference (pp. 492-509). International Pragmatics Association.
Sbisà, M. (2007): Detto non detto. Le forme della comunicazione implicita. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Soames, S. (1989). Presupposition. In D. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic (pp. 553-616). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz & P. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and Philosophy (pp. 197-214). New York: New York University Press. [Reprinted in S. Davis (Ed.) 1991: 471-481.]
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995a). Opinions and ideologies in editorials. 4th International Symposium of Critical Discourse Analysis, Language, Social Life and Critical Thought, Athens: 14-16.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995b). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse and Society, 6(2), 243-289.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12954
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Share us to: 
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture 
