Language Contribution to Inequality: African American Female Students' Self-efficacy and Math Anxiety
Abstract
This paper examines language contribution to inequality through the lens of African American Female Students' Self-efficacy and Math Anxiety. Studies have defined Self-efficacy as one's perceived ability and capability, and that it builds on the language and culture around students. Research stated that low levels of math literacy and self-efficacy beliefs are related to gender, school type, class, mathematics degree, parents' educational status, and economic status. The result is a twofold dilemma for African American females, since through race, they face higher chances of math anxiety and an elevated probability of lingering effects throughout their academic experience because of gender. The article further suggests that educational systems need to incorporate self-efficacy as the theoretical framework for curriculum and standard structure. The article concludes that recommended use of self-efficacy as a theoretical framework is necessary to analyze everyday unintentional language oppression, and its manifestation through disciplinary literacy such as mathematics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
Bartlett, L. (2008). Literacy's verb: Exploring what literacy is and what literacy does. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(6), 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2007.09.002
Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math, and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-012-9185-3
Beilock, S., & Willingham, D. T. (2014). Math anxiety: Can teachers help students reduce it?
E. Birr Moje, P. Afflerbach, P. Enciso, & N. K. Lesaux (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of reading research. Volume v (Vol. 5). Routledge.
Brock, C. H., Thompson McMillon, G., Pennington, J. L., Townsend, D., Lapp, D. (2009). Academic English and African American vernacular English. In L. Mandel Morrow, R. Rueda, D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy and diversity, (1st ed., pp.137-157). Guilford.
Buck, J., & Buck, J. (2019). Consequences of math anxiety and stereotype Threat: An intersectional perspective. Intersectional Perspective Part of the Educational Psychology Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Repository Citation Citation. https://doi.org/10.34917/18608678
Casad, B. J., Hale, P., & Wachs, F. L. (2017). Stereotype Threat Among Girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4), 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317711412
Casanova, S., Vukovic, R. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2021). Do girls pay an unequal price? Black and Latina girls' math attitudes, anxiety, and mathematics achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 73, 101256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2021.101256
Chowdhury, S. R. (2014). A study on mathematics anxiety among the 9th and 10th-grade secondary school students of Tinsukia district in Assam, India. The Clarion- International Multidisciplinary Journal, 3, 94-101.
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry. American Educator, Summer, 43, 28-32.
Cooper, E.J., (2009). Afterward: From "just a teacher" to justice in teaching-Working in the service of education, the new civil right. In L. M. Morrow, R. Rueda, & D. Lapp, (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy and diversity (pp. 431-436). Guilford.
Crumb, L., Haskins, N., Dean, L., & Avent Harris, J. (2020). Illuminating social-class identity: The persistence of working-class African American women doctoral students. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 13(3), 215-227.
Dew, K. H., Galassi, J. P., & Galassi, M. D. (1984). Math anxiety: Relation with situational test anxiety, performance, physiological arousal, and math avoidance behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 580-583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.4.580
Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., Chu, F., Scofield, J. E., & Ferguson Hibbard, D. (2019). Sex differences in mathematics anxiety and attitudes: Concurrent and longitudinal relations to mathematical competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1447. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000355
Gordon, E.W. (2009). Every child must be visible if we are to succeed as a world-class nation. In L.M. Morrow, R. Rueda, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Literacy and Diversity (1st ed., pp. ix-xi). Guilford.
Howlett, M. (2021). Looking at the ‘field’ through a zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research, 146879412098569. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691
Johnson, D. R., Scheitle, C. P., & Ecklund, E. H. (2021). Beyond the in-person interview? How interview quality varies across in-person, telephone, and skype interviews. Social Science Computer Review, 39(6), 1142-1158.
Lapadat, J., & Lindsay, A. (1999). Transcription in research and practice: From standardization of technique to interpretive positionings. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 64-86.
Lichtman, M. (2013). Qualitative education research: A user's guide.
Macmull, M. S., & Ashkenazi, S. (2019). Math Anxiety: The Relationship Between Parenting Style and Math Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01721
McLean, C. A., Boling, E. C., & Rowsell, J. (2009). Engaging diverse students in multiple literacies in and out of school. In L. M. Morrow, R. Rueda, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy and diversity (1st ed., pp. 158-172). Guilford.
Oishi, S. M. (2003). How to conduct in-person interviews for surveys (Vol. 5). Sage.
Ollerenshaw, J. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2002). Narrative research: A comparison of two restorying data analysis approaches. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 329-347.
Ozgen, K., & Bindaka, R. (2011). Determination of Self-Efficacy Beliefs of High School Students towards Math Literacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(2), 1085-1089.https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004008003008
Portes, P., & Salas, S. (2009). Poverty and its relation to development and literacy. In L.M. Morrow, R. Rueda, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Literacy and Diversity (1st ed., pp. 97-113). Guilford.
Privitera, G. J., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2019). Chapter nine surveys and correlational research designs. In Research methods for education. Essay, SAGE.
Saldana, J. M. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sarroub, L. K. (2002). In-betweenness: Religion and conflicting visions of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(2), 130-148. https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.37.2.2
Schaeffer, M. W., Rozek, C. S., Berkowitz, T., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2018). Disassociating the relation between parents’ math anxiety and children’s math achievement: Long-term effects of a math app intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1782-1790. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000490
Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2012). What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders, 32(1), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0B013E318244557A
Simon, M. (2011). The role of the researcher.
Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. (Ed.) (1993). Cross-cultural approaches to literacy. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Street, B. (Ed.) (2001). Literacy and development: Ethnographic perspectives. London: Routledge.
Thomas, S. (2012). Narrative inquiry: embracing the possibilities. Qualitative Research Journal, 12(2), 206-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/14439881211248356
Tilley, S. A. (2003). "Challenging" research practices: Turning a critical lens on transcription work. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(5), 750-773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403255296
Tuncer, M., & Yilmaz, Ö. (2020). Relations attitude towards mathematics lesson, anxiety and academic success. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.2020.4061
Young, J., & Young, J. (2016). Young, black, and anxious: Describing the black student mathematics anxiety research using confidence intervals. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(1), 79-93. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1108452.pdf
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/12706
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reminder
- How to do online submission to another Journal?
- If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:
1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author
- Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.
2. Submission
Online Submission: http://cscanada.org/index.php/ccc/submission/wizard
- Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.
- We only use four mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases: caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.net; ccc@cscanada.org
Articles published in Cross-Cultural Communication are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).
CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION Editorial Office
Address: 1055 Rue Lucien-L'Allier, Unit #772, Montreal, QC H3G 3C4, Canada.
Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com; office@cscanada.net
Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture